In the city of Babylon, in what is now Iraq, almost 3,800 years ago, a king named Hammurabi did something unusual. He took 282 of the rules of his kingdom and had them carved onto a tall pillar of hard black stone. The pillar was placed in a public space, where people could see it. At the top, a carved scene shows Hammurabi receiving the rules from the sun god, Shamash. Below the scene, the laws are written in tiny, wedge-shaped marks called cuneiform. The pillar still stands today, almost complete. It is in a museum in Paris. The Code of Hammurabi is famous as one of the oldest sets of written laws we still have. People often say it shows the rule of 'an eye for an eye'. This is partly true. But when you read the laws carefully, something else becomes clear: the same crime had different punishments, depending on who you were. A free man was not equal to a slave. A man was not equal to a woman. The Code is a window into how a real society organised itself almost 4,000 years ago — and into the ways its idea of fairness was very different from ours. This object can teach us where written law comes from, who it has served, and what it took to put rules in stone.
Most students will say 'write it down'. Push them: where do you write it? On a piece of paper that can be lost? In a book that few people can read? On a stone in the middle of the city, where everyone can see it and where it cannot be changed? This is exactly what Hammurabi did. The Code is not just a set of laws — it is a clever piece of design. By carving the laws in hard stone in a public place, Hammurabi made them harder to forget, harder to change, and harder to lie about. This is the moment law becomes 'public': the rules belong to everyone, not only to the king and his ministers. Students should see that the choice to put law in stone is itself a kind of law-making.
This is the most important moment in the lesson. The famous phrase 'an eye for an eye' is real — but it only applied if both people were the same kind of person. If a higher-status man hurt a lower-status man, he just paid money. If he hurt a slave, he paid the slave's owner — not the slave. The slave got nothing. This is a 'graded' or 'tiered' society. Babylonian law worked on three groups: free people of higher rank (awilum), free people of lower rank (mushkenum), and slaves (wardum). Same crime, different price. Students may feel angry. That is the right reaction. But also notice: the laws are at least clear and public, which means even a poor person knows what to expect. In many places before written law, the powerful could simply do as they liked. The Code is a step forward — and at the same time, far from what we would call fair today. Both things are true.
This is a richer puzzle than the Standard of Ur. The Code has had three homes: Babylon (Iraq), Susa (Iran), and Paris (France). Each home claims something. Iraq says: it was made here, by our cultural ancestors, in our language. Iran says: it was found here. France says: we have cared for it for over 100 years and millions of visitors see it. There is no easy answer. Some students may say 'it belongs to humanity'. That is a real argument too. The point is not to pick a winner but to see that this object's story is also a story about who gets to keep history. Students can also ask: who is missing from this conversation? Iraqi voices, Iranian voices, and the people of Babylon themselves are not represented in the museum that holds their object.
This carving is doing political work. It says: 'These are not Hammurabi's laws. They are the gods' laws. I am only the king. I am giving you what the gods gave me.' This is a very old, very common move by powerful people: claim that your power comes from above, so it cannot be questioned. Students should see this clearly. It is the same move kings, emperors, and even some modern leaders have made for thousands of years. It is also worth asking: why did Hammurabi need to make this claim? Probably because, without it, people might say: 'Why should I follow your rules and not someone else's?' By tying the laws to the gods, Hammurabi makes them harder to argue with. Modern democracies do the opposite — they say laws come from the people, not from gods. Both ideas are about where law's power comes from.
The Code of Hammurabi is a tall stone pillar carved with 282 laws by King Hammurabi of Babylon, almost 3,800 years ago. The laws cover marriage, debt, building, theft, and many other parts of daily life. They are famous for the rule of 'an eye for an eye', but a closer look shows the punishments depended on the social rank of both the victim and the criminal. The Code is one of the oldest sets of written laws we still have, but it was not the first — the Code of Ur-Nammu came earlier. The pillar was made in Iraq, taken as war loot to Iran, and dug up in 1901 by French archaeologists who took it to Paris. The Code teaches us where the idea of public, written law comes from — and how that idea can hold both fairness and unfairness at the same time.
| Question | Code of Hammurabi | Modern law |
|---|---|---|
| Where are the rules? | Carved on a stone pillar in a public place | Written in books and online; updated regularly |
| Who do the rules apply to? | Different rules for free people, freed people, and slaves | In most countries, the same rules for everyone (in theory) |
| Where do the rules come from? | From the gods, given through the king | From the people, through elected lawmakers (in democracies) |
| What if you break a rule? | Often physical punishment, sometimes a fine | Usually a fine or prison; physical punishment is rare |
| Can you appeal? | Only to the king | To higher courts, with a lawyer |
The Code of Hammurabi is the first written law in history.
It is one of the oldest we still have, but the Code of Ur-Nammu, also from Mesopotamia, is about 300 years older. There may have been even older codes that have been lost.
People often want a 'first' to point at. The truth is that written law grew slowly, in many places, over hundreds of years.
'An eye for an eye' meant the same punishment for everyone, no matter who they were.
In the Code of Hammurabi, the same crime had very different punishments depending on the social rank of the people involved. A free person who hurt a slave paid a fine to the slave's owner. A free person who hurt another free person of the same rank could lose their own eye.
'An eye for an eye' is often used today to mean fair, equal punishment. In its original setting, it was nothing of the kind.
Ancient law was simple. Modern law is much more complex.
The Code of Hammurabi already covers contracts, marriage, divorce, building safety, debt, false witnesses, and theft. Many of the same questions our laws answer were being answered 3,800 years ago.
We often think of the past as simple. In fact, ancient societies dealt with complex legal questions, sometimes in more detail than students might expect.
The Code of Hammurabi belongs in the Louvre because France discovered it.
This is one view, but it is not the only one. The Code was made in Babylon (Iraq) and was taken to Susa (Iran) more than 600 years before any French person saw it. The question of where it should be today is a real and live one.
'We found it' is not the same as 'it is ours'. Students should see that the story of how an object reaches a museum is itself part of the lesson.
This object touches three modern countries — Iraq, Iran, and France — and a teacher should not let any of them become a hero or a villain. The Code was made in Babylon (Iraq), taken as war loot in ancient times to Susa (Iran), found by French archaeologists in 1901, and is now in Paris; each step of that journey involved real people making real choices, and any of them could be the focus of fair criticism. Treat this honestly without picking a winner. Do not call ancient Babylon 'primitive' or its laws 'simple' — they are detailed and thoughtful, even when their values differ from ours. The most important sensitivity is the laws themselves: the Code includes provisions about women, slaves, and rank that many students will find unfair. Do not soften them; read them out plainly, then talk about why they were that way and what has changed. Some Babylonian laws also gave women rights that surprised modern readers — for example, women could own property, run businesses, and bring legal cases — and this is worth saying. Finally, when discussing 'an eye for an eye', do not let the popular phrase do the work. Use the actual laws (196, 198, 199) so students see what the Code really says.
Answer each question in one or two sentences. Use what you have learned about the Code of Hammurabi.
What is the Code of Hammurabi made of, and how old is it?
Why is it not quite right to say 'the Code of Hammurabi gave the same punishment for the same crime'?
What does the carving at the top of the stele show, and why is it important?
How did the Code travel from Iraq to Paris?
Give one way the Code of Hammurabi was a step forward in its time, and one way it was unfair by our standards today.
These questions have no single right answer. Talk in pairs or small groups, then share your ideas with the class.
Should the Code of Hammurabi go back to Iraq, or to Iran, or stay in France? Or does it belong to all of humanity?
If you were carving a code of laws for your school today, what three rules would you put first? Why?
Hammurabi said his laws came from the gods. Modern laws come from elected lawmakers. Which makes a law more powerful — believing it comes from above, or knowing it comes from the people?
Your feedback helps other teachers and helps us improve TeachAnyClass.
