In the high desert country of the southwestern United States — in northeastern Arizona, northwestern New Mexico, southeastern Utah, and southwestern Colorado — the Diné people have been weaving for centuries. The Diné are also called Navajo by outsiders, though Diné (which means 'the People' in their own language) is the name they use for themselves. The Diné Nation today is the largest Indigenous nation in the United States, with about 400,000 enrolled members and a reservation of about 71,000 square kilometres — bigger than Ireland. The weaving tradition probably began in the 1600s, when Diné people learned weaving techniques from their Pueblo neighbours. The Pueblos had been weaving with cotton for centuries before. The Diné adopted the loom and adapted the technique. Crucially, they used wool — from churro sheep, a Spanish breed brought by colonisers in the 1500s. The Diné became expert sheep herders and wool spinners. Within a few generations, Diné weaving had developed its own distinctive style. The work is done on a vertical loom — two upright posts with horizontal beams between them. The weaver sits on the ground in front of the loom. She (most weavers are women) sets up vertical threads — the warp — and then weaves horizontal threads — the weft — across them, packing each row tightly with a wooden comb. The patterns build row by row, from the bottom up. A skilled weaver carries the design in her head, sometimes adjusting it as she goes. A typical small blanket might take a few weeks of full-time work. A complex large rug might take a year or more. Different periods and regions produce different distinctive styles. The earliest 'chief blankets' (the name comes from European traders, who saw them being worn by Plains chiefs to whom the Diné had traded them) are bold, with strong horizontal stripes. Later styles include 'Two Grey Hills' (specific to one region, with intricate patterns in undyed wool colours), 'Storm Pattern' (with central squares and zigzag lines representing storms and lightning), 'Burntwater' (with bright commercial colours and elaborate borders), and many others. Each style has its own conventions and its own innovations. The tradition has long been the subject of cultural appropriation. From the late 1800s, traders and tourists bought Diné textiles in large numbers. Some traders had real working relationships with Diné weavers; others paid below fair value. By the 20th century, fake 'Navajo' products were widely sold — blankets, jewellery, decorative items — made by people with no connection to the Diné. The Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990 made it illegal in the United States to sell falsely labelled Native American goods, but the practice continued. In 2012, the Navajo Nation sued Urban Outfitters for selling 'Navajo' products that had no connection to the Diné. The case settled in 2016. The fight continues. This lesson asks how Diné weaving works, what its patterns mean, and what its long history of cultural appropriation teaches about respect.
Because the work was originally for the family. Diné weavers made textiles for their own household — blankets to keep warm, saddle blankets for horses, clothing components. Doing the work from sheep to blanket meant the family had control of the entire process. The wool came from sheep they tended on their land. The dyes came from plants they knew. The patterns came from what they had been taught and what they imagined. The result was an object completely owned by the maker. As the textiles became commercial in the late 1800s, much of this changed. Commercial dyes replaced natural ones. Sometimes commercial yarns replaced hand-spun wool. The weavers worked for traders who marketed to tourists. The completeness was reduced. But the basic structure remained: one woman, one loom, hand work from start to finish. Some Diné weavers today are working hard to preserve the full from-sheep-to-blanket tradition. The Navajo Churro Sheep Association supports the breed. Master weavers teach apprentices the full process. Younger Diné women are learning all the steps, not just the weaving. Students should see that the tradition is both alive and being carefully maintained. Each generation chooses what to preserve.
Because the trading posts of the late 1800s and early 1900s influenced the regional styles. Particular trading posts — Hubbell at Ganado, the Crystal trading post, Two Grey Hills, Burntwater — encouraged particular styles in their local weavers. Some traders worked closely with weavers and helped develop new patterns. Others simply enforced what sold to tourists. The result was both genuine regional development and imposed commercial standardisation, mixed together. The weavers themselves were the artists. Even within a regional style, individual weavers innovated. Some refused to weave repeating patterns and would deliberately break them — sometimes by including a small 'spirit line' (a deliberate flaw or escape route in the pattern) so that the weaver's spirit was not trapped in the rug. The same kind of careful balance between tradition and innovation happens in many craft traditions worldwide. Persian carpets, Indonesian batik, kente cloth, suzani — all have inherited patterns and personal variations together. The Diné is one specific case of a wider human practice. Students should see that 'tradition' is not static. Each weaver inherits patterns and adds her own contribution. The regional styles are like dialects of one language — recognisably part of the same tradition, but different from each other.
Because the financial incentives are clear. 'Native American' style sells well in the United States and beyond. There is real demand for products with that aesthetic. Authentic products are more expensive (because the work is real and the makers must be paid fairly). Fakes can be much cheaper. The economic logic favours fake production unless laws are strong and enforcement is consistent. The Diné case is part of a wider pattern that includes the Maasai shuka (in another lesson in this collection), kente cloth, the dreamcatcher, and many others. In each case, an Indigenous or traditional design has been used by outside companies without permission or payment. The communities have all been fighting back, with varying success. The Diné Nation is well-organised and has registered trademarks; the Maasai have the Maasai Intellectual Property Initiative; the Akan have similar efforts for kente cloth. These struggles are part of a worldwide movement for Indigenous and cultural property rights. The Diné are one of the most successful cases — but the fight is not finished. Every generation of advocates faces new instances of appropriation. Students should see that 'cultural appropriation' is not just an abstract concept. It is a real economic and legal issue affecting real working artists. The Diné weavers have been fighting this for over a century. End the discovery on this idea of continuing struggle.
Alive, complex, and genuinely valuable. The tradition has survived 400 years of enormous change — Spanish colonisation, the Long Walk, the rug period, government livestock reduction, decades of cultural appropriation, modern economic pressures. It has not been preserved like a museum object. It has continued by being practised, adapted, defended, and taught. Every generation of Diné weavers has chosen to continue. Every Diné advocate has chosen to fight for the rights of the makers. The result is a tradition that is genuinely alive — not just preserved, but practised in ways that honour both inherited patterns and personal innovation. The same pattern appears in many other Indigenous traditions worldwide. The Maori pounamu, the Akan kente cloth, the Hawaiian kapa, the Polynesian voyaging — all have similar histories of pressure, fight, and continued life. The Diné is one of the most successful cases of an Indigenous textile tradition continuing to thrive. The work continues today. The looms are set up. The wool is being spun. The next blanket is being woven. End the lesson on this present.
Diné (Navajo) weaving is a major textile tradition of the southwestern United States, with about 400 years of documented history. The Diné Nation today is the largest Indigenous nation in the United States, with about 400,000 enrolled members. Diné weavers — primarily women — work on vertical looms, weaving wool from churro sheep into blankets, rugs, and other textiles. The tradition probably began in the 1600s when the Diné learned weaving from Pueblo neighbours and adopted churro sheep brought by Spanish colonisers. Different historical periods and regions produce distinctive styles. The Classic period (1650-1865) produced bold-striped chief blankets that were among the most valuable trade items in the southwestern United States. The Transitional period (1865-1895) was a difficult time, including the Long Walk forced relocation. The Rug period (1895-present) saw the development of regional styles for the American tourist market — Two Grey Hills, Ganado Red, Storm Pattern, Burntwater, and many others. The tradition has been heavily affected by cultural appropriation, with fake 'Navajo' products produced by outside companies for over a century. The Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990 made falsely labelled Native American goods illegal in the United States. In 2012, the Navajo Nation sued Urban Outfitters for selling fake 'Navajo' products; the case settled in 2016. The fight continues. Today, Diné weaving is alive, with master weavers training new generations, regional styles continuing to be practised, and the Diné Nation continuing to advocate for makers' rights. Churro sheep are being restored after near-destruction by US government livestock reduction programmes in the 1930s-40s.
| Date | Event | What changed |
|---|---|---|
| 1500s | Spanish bring sheep to the Americas | Churro sheep eventually adopted by Diné, providing wool for weaving |
| 1600s | Diné learn weaving from Pueblo neighbours | The tradition begins; Diné style develops over generations |
| 1650-1865 | Classic period | Chief blankets produced; among most valuable trade items in the region |
| 1864-1868 | The Long Walk | US Army forces Diné to Bosque Redondo; weaving disrupted but not lost |
| 1865-1895 | Transitional period | New dyes, new patterns; tradition adapts after the Long Walk |
| 1895-present | Rug period | Regional styles develop for the American tourist market |
| 1990 | Indian Arts and Crafts Act passed | Falsely labelled Native American goods become illegal in the US |
| 2012-2016 | Navajo Nation v. Urban Outfitters | Major case against fake 'Navajo' products; settled in 2016 |
'Navajo' is the proper name; 'Diné' is informal.
'Diné' is the name the people use for themselves; 'Navajo' is the name given by outsiders. Both are widely used today, but increasing numbers of Diné people prefer 'Diné' or 'Diné Bikéyah' (the Diné Land). The choice is meaningful.
Knowing the right name is part of basic respect.
Diné weaving is just folk craft.
It is fine art with hundreds of years of refined tradition, regional schools, recognised master weavers, and pieces selling for hundreds of thousands of dollars. Major museums collect Diné textiles alongside other significant world art.
'Just folk' undersells what Diné weaving is. The art is sophisticated and serious.
Diné weavers were always isolated traditional communities.
Diné weaving has always been part of wider economic and cultural networks. The wool came from Spanish-introduced sheep. The chief blankets were trade goods across the Plains. The rug period developed for the American tourist market. The tradition has always engaged with outside influences while maintaining its identity.
'Always isolated' is a romanticised view that misses the real history.
Cultural appropriation is just about naming.
It is also about money, recognition, and continuity of tradition. When companies sell fake 'Navajo' products, they take revenue from real Diné weavers. They also create a market saturated with imitations, making it harder for authentic work to be valued. The harm is economic as much as symbolic.
Understanding the economic dimension is essential to understanding why Diné advocates fight so hard against appropriation.
Treat the Diné Nation as a real existing nation, not a historical 'tribe'. Use 'Diné' as the primary name, with 'Navajo' as an alternative both names readers may recognise. Pronounce 'Diné' as roughly 'dih-NAY'. Be careful with 'tribe' — most Indigenous peoples in North America today prefer 'nation', 'people', or specific names. Respect the Diné Nation's status as a sovereign government with its own constitution, courts, schools, and elected leaders. Be honest about the Long Walk (1864-1868). About 8,000 Diné were forced on a march of more than 480 km to Bosque Redondo, where they were imprisoned for four years. Many died. The episode is a major historical wound. Mention it briefly and seriously without dwelling on graphic detail. Many Diné students may have ancestors who were affected. Be balanced about traders. The relationship between traders and Diné weavers in the late 1800s and early 1900s was complex — some traders had real working partnerships with weavers; others paid below fair value; the regional rug styles emerged from this mixed history. Avoid framings that present traders only as exploiters or only as helpful intermediaries. Both extremes simplify a complicated history. If you have students of Diné or other Indigenous heritage, give them space to share but do not put them on the spot. Be aware that the Diné Nation faces serious economic challenges today, including high unemployment, water access issues, and the legacy of uranium mining. The lesson is about weaving but exists in this larger context. Be careful with the spirit line concept (the deliberate flaw in some Diné textiles). Some Diné consider this a private tradition. Mention it briefly if at all. Do not encourage students to imitate this in their own designs without further understanding. Avoid the lazy 'mystical Native American' framing. Diné weaving is sophisticated craft and art. The patterns have specific meanings to the makers, but they are not vague mysticism. Finally, end the lesson on the present. The looms are set up. The weavers are working. The Diné Nation is alive. The story continues.
Answer each question in one or two sentences. Use what you have learned about Diné weaving.
Who are the Diné, and where do they live?
How is a Diné textile made?
What is one major regional style of Diné weaving and what makes it distinctive?
What is the Indian Arts and Crafts Act, and why does it matter?
What was the 2012 Navajo Nation v. Urban Outfitters case about?
These questions have no single right answer. Talk in pairs or small groups, then share your ideas with the class.
Why has cultural appropriation of Diné designs continued for over a century, despite laws and lawsuits?
In your country, are there traditional designs that are heavily appropriated? What protections exist or should exist?
Diné weaving has continued for 400 years through major changes — Spanish colonisation, the Long Walk, the rug period, livestock reduction, decades of appropriation. What does the tradition's survival teach us?
Your feedback helps other teachers and helps us improve TeachAnyClass.
