In the woodlands of northeastern North America, around lakes and rivers we now call the Great Lakes and the St Lawrence, there has been a way of recording agreements for hundreds of years. The agreement is not written down. It is woven into a belt of small shell beads. The shells come from two creatures of the coast — the whelk, which gives white beads, and the quahog clam, which gives purple. The beads are arranged in patterns. Each pattern means something. The whole belt can be read by someone who knows the tradition. The Haudenosaunee — known to many people as the Iroquois — have used these belts to record treaties, alliances, condolences, and important events. One belt, called the Two Row Wampum, records a treaty made in 1613 between Haudenosaunee leaders and Dutch traders. The pattern shows two lines of purple beads on a white background — two paths down the same river of life, one for each people, neither steering the other's boat. The Haudenosaunee say the treaty is still in force. Many of the countries that came after the Dutch — including the United States and Canada — do not always remember it the same way. This lesson asks how a belt can be a law, what happens when peoples remember the same agreement differently, and what we can still learn from a tradition that turns shells into binding words.
Several reasons. First: the shells are durable. Wampum beads survive for centuries when properly cared for. Second: the colours are clear. White and purple show up sharply against each other and do not fade. Third: the patterns are physical. You can run your fingers along them, count them, see them clearly. Fourth: the belts are valuable, so they are kept carefully. Fifth: the tradition is shared — many people are trained to read the belts, so the meaning is held by a community, not by one person who could die without passing it on. The Haudenosaunee also developed careful procedures for using wampum: belts are passed from hand to hand at meetings, the agreement is spoken aloud as the belt is given, and the spoken words and the patterns reinforce each other. This is similar in spirit to a Western legal system where written law and spoken testimony work together. Students should see that 'no writing' does not mean 'no record'. The Haudenosaunee have one of the most sophisticated record-keeping systems ever developed. Like the quipu or the Indus seal, it tells us that 'writing' is one option among several.
This is one of the deepest questions in the lesson. The Two Row Wampum is the oldest treaty between Indigenous peoples and Europeans on what is now the territory of the United States and Canada. It set a principle: two peoples sharing land, neither erasing the other. Over the next 400 years, that principle was broken many times. European settlers took Haudenosaunee land. Many treaties that came after the Two Row Wampum promised more — that schools, hospitals, and supplies would be provided in exchange for land — and many of those promises were broken. Haudenosaunee today often point to the Two Row Wampum as a kind of foundation: a treaty that, if it had been kept, would have led to a very different history. Some Haudenosaunee leaders have used it as the basis for modern claims about sovereignty, land rights, and self-government. They argue that the Haudenosaunee never gave up the right to govern themselves. The treaty did not say they would. It said only that the two peoples would travel side by side. Students should see that this is a living question. There are real debates today, in courts and in politics, about what treaty obligations remain. The Two Row Wampum is one of the oldest pieces of evidence for the Haudenosaunee position.
This is a question with a real and complicated answer. The Haudenosaunee Confederacy was already old in 1750 — possibly several centuries old. It worked. The new United States was looking for a model of how thirteen separate states could cooperate without one dominating the others. Franklin in 1751 wrote: 'It would be a strange thing if Six Nations of ignorant savages should be capable of forming a Scheme for such an Union, and yet that a like Union should be impracticable for ten or a Dozen English Colonies.' (His use of 'savages' was the language of his time. He clearly admired the Haudenosaunee system.) In 1988, the United States Congress formally acknowledged the influence of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy on the Constitution. Historians still debate exactly how much was borrowed and how directly, but the connection is real. Students should see that the United States and Canada did not invent democracy from nothing. They borrowed from many sources, including ancient Greece, Roman law, English Parliament — and the Haudenosaunee. The wampum belts are physical evidence of one of the oldest functioning democracies in the world. End the discovery here. The histories are tangled together more than older textbooks once said.
To carry an agreement. A wampum belt is not just an art object or a historical artefact. It is a working legal document, in the same way a written treaty is. It records a specific agreement, in a specific form, that the community can read and reaffirm. Belts are used in modern Haudenosaunee government — at council meetings, in negotiations with Canadian and American officials, in ceremonies of condolence when a leader dies. A belt that is locked in a museum drawer 1,000 km away cannot be used this way. This is why repatriation matters. It is not only about justice for the past. It is about whether the Haudenosaunee can carry out their own ongoing legal and ceremonial life. Students should see that 'museum' and 'living object' are not always the same thing. Many objects in museums are perfectly happy there — they are admired, studied, preserved. Others, like wampum belts, were never meant to be removed from their communities. Returning them is part of giving back the means of self-government. End the discovery here. The work continues.
A wampum belt is a long woven band of small shell beads — white from whelk shells and purple from quahog clams — used by the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) and other First Nations peoples of the northeastern North American woodlands to record agreements, treaties, and important events. Each pattern in the belt means something specific. Belts can be read by trained people in the community, generation after generation. The Two Row Wampum, made in 1613, records the oldest treaty between Indigenous peoples and Europeans in this region: two peoples in separate boats, going down the same river of life, neither steering the other's boat. The Haudenosaunee say this treaty is still in force. The Haudenosaunee Confederacy is one of the oldest continuous democracies in the world. Some of its ideas about cooperation among separate nations influenced the United States Constitution. In recent decades, museums have begun returning wampum belts to the communities they belong to, recognising that the belts are not just historical objects but working legal documents.
| Question | What many people assume | What is actually true |
|---|---|---|
| What is wampum? | A kind of money | Mostly shell beads used to record agreements; some trade use with Europeans came later |
| Are wampum belts just art? | Yes | They are working legal documents, like written treaties — readable by trained people in the community |
| Are the Haudenosaunee still here? | They were wiped out | They are alive today, with their own government, language, and treaty system. Around 75,000 enrolled members. |
| Did the Haudenosaunee influence the US Constitution? | No | Yes — the US Congress formally acknowledged this in 1988. Benjamin Franklin and others studied their government. |
| Where are the belts now? | Mostly in museums | Many are now being returned. The Haudenosaunee say belts in museum cases cannot do their work. |
Wampum was just money.
Wampum was sometimes used in trade with Europeans, but its main purpose among the Haudenosaunee was to record agreements, treaties, condolences, and important events. Calling it 'money' tells half the story.
This was an early European misunderstanding that stuck. Wampum is closer to a legal document than to a coin.
The Haudenosaunee are extinct or only exist in museums.
The Haudenosaunee are alive today, with around 75,000 enrolled members, six nations, their own government, and active treaty negotiations. They speak their languages, make wampum, and govern themselves.
Older textbooks often used the past tense for First Nations peoples. The truth is a present tense.
The United States invented modern democracy from European sources only.
The Haudenosaunee Confederacy was already an old democracy when the United States was founded. Benjamin Franklin and other founders studied it. The US Congress in 1988 formally acknowledged the Haudenosaunee influence on the Constitution.
This story has been hidden in many history books. Telling it more honestly gives credit where it is due.
Old treaties from the 1600s and 1700s no longer matter.
Many of these treaties are still legally in force. The Treaty of Canandaigua of 1794 is acknowledged each year with gifts of cloth from the US government. The Two Row Wampum of 1613 is cited in modern Haudenosaunee statements about sovereignty.
'Old' and 'no longer in force' are very different things. Treaties are agreements between peoples, and peoples remember.
This lesson is about a living people with a living legal tradition. Treat it that way. Use the proper terms — Haudenosaunee, Iroquois (used by both insiders and outsiders, but Haudenosaunee is the people's own term), the Six Nations, Confederacy, Two Row Wampum. Pronounce 'Haudenosaunee' as roughly 'hoe-dee-no-SHOW-nee'. Do not use the past tense for the Haudenosaunee. They are alive today, with their own government and treaties. Do not call their society 'primitive' or 'simple' — the Confederacy is one of the oldest continuous democracies in the world. Be honest about the breaking of treaties by the US and Canadian governments, but do not turn the lesson into a one-sided history of grievance. The Two Row Wampum is also a positive idea — two peoples, side by side — that has been honoured at times and broken at times. When discussing repatriation, present it as ongoing work rather than a settled question. Some institutions are returning belts; others have not. If you have Indigenous students or students with First Nations connections, give them space to share if they want, but do not put them on the spot. Do not use the words 'tribe' or 'savages' or 'pagan' — these were colonial-era words that are now considered disrespectful in many contexts. Use 'nation' or 'people'. Finally, treat wampum belts as legal documents, not just as art. The whole lesson rests on this distinction. They are both — but the legal weight is what older history often missed.
Answer each question in one or two sentences. Use what you have learned about wampum belts.
What is a wampum belt, and what is it used for?
What is the Two Row Wampum, and what does it record?
Why is it wrong to call wampum 'just money'?
How did the Haudenosaunee Confederacy influence the United States Constitution?
Why does it matter when wampum belts are returned to Haudenosaunee communities from museums?
These questions have no single right answer. Talk in pairs or small groups, then share your ideas with the class.
The Two Row Wampum says two peoples can travel side by side without steering each other's boats. Today, in your country, are there examples of this kind of relationship — or examples where it has not worked?
Should objects like wampum belts be in museums, or should they all be returned to the communities they came from?
If you had to record a really important agreement — between two friends, two families, or two countries — without writing or technology, how would you do it?
Your feedback helps other teachers and helps us improve TeachAnyClass.
