How to read, listen, and view with a questioning mind — understanding that all texts are constructed, that they make choices about what to include and exclude, and that those choices reflect and shape power. A foundational skill for active citizenship, designed for low-cost classrooms where print and oral texts are the primary media.
Critical literacy at Early Years level is about introducing the idea that stories and pictures are made — they do not just exist naturally. Someone chose what to put in and what to leave out, who to show and how to show them. Young children are already natural critical readers in some ways: they notice when a story feels unfair, they ask why a character did something, and they identify with some characters more than others. The goal is to make these instincts conscious and to give children simple language for questioning what they see and hear. In low-resource contexts, the most available texts are often oral — stories told by elders, songs, proverbs, and community narratives. These are valid and rich texts for critical literacy work. You do not need printed books or screens. Any story — told, sung, or drawn — can be read critically. Key questions to use repeatedly with young children: Who is in this story? Who is not in this story? How are they shown — are they kind, strong, weak, silly? Does this feel fair? Could the story be told differently? Be sensitive to the fact that many traditional stories carry genuine cultural value. Critical literacy is not about dismissing these stories but about reading them thoughtfully — appreciating what they offer while also noticing what assumptions they carry.
Any drawing of a character who is genuinely absent from a known story — a girl in a story with only boys, an old person in a story with only young heroes, a poor person in a story about wealth. The completion should name a reason for the absence and a genuine claim about why that perspective matters. The goal is for children to notice absence as a choice, not a neutral fact.
Look for genuine imagination and empathy in the choice of missing character. Celebrate children who choose characters from their own community or experience. The explanation of why the character matters is more important than the drawing itself.
Any genuine story drawn from the child's own experience — going to the market, helping at home, playing with friends, a community celebration, a difficult moment. The value is in the authenticity and the child's ownership of their own narrative, not in any particular content or quality of writing.
Celebrate all genuine self-expression. Ask: Why did you choose this moment to tell? What did you want people to know about your life? These questions deepen the metacognitive dimension of authorship.
Stories in books are more true or more important than oral stories.
Written and oral stories are equally valid. Many of the world's most important stories have never been written down — they live in communities through telling, singing, and remembering. In many cultures, oral tradition carries the deepest knowledge. Critical literacy applies to all texts — spoken, sung, drawn, and written.
Questioning a story means you do not like it or respect it.
Questioning a story is a sign of deep engagement with it. We question stories because they matter — because they shape how we see the world. A story can be beautiful, meaningful, and culturally important AND still be worth reading carefully and critically. These things are not in conflict.
Children cannot be authors — authorship is for adults and experts.
Everyone who tells a story is an author. Every choice about what to include, who to show, and how to describe them is an act of authorship. Children are authors every time they tell a story about their day, draw a picture of their family, or sing a song they made up. Recognising this is the beginning of critical literacy.
Critical literacy is the practice of reading texts — written, visual, oral, or multimodal — with attention to how they construct meaning, whose interests they serve, and what they include and exclude. It goes beyond comprehension (understanding what a text says) and beyond critical thinking (evaluating whether arguments are well-supported) to ask deeper questions: Why was this text made? By whom and for whom? Whose reality does it reflect? Whose does it ignore or distort? What does it want me to believe or feel? Four key principles underpin critical literacy teaching. First, texts are not neutral — every text is constructed by someone with a particular perspective, purpose, and position in society. This includes textbooks, news articles, religious texts, oral stories, and government documents. Second, texts represent and misrepresent — some people, communities, and ways of life appear frequently and are shown positively; others appear rarely or are shown in limited and often negative ways. Third, language is not neutral — the words chosen to describe people and events carry assumptions and values. Calling someone a freedom fighter versus a terrorist, or describing a community as developing versus poor, are choices that shape how readers think. Fourth, reading is never passive — readers always bring their own experience to a text and always have the power to question, resist, or rewrite what they read. In low-resource contexts, critical literacy is especially important because students are often the consumers of texts produced elsewhere — textbooks, religious materials, and media that may not reflect their reality or serve their interests. Teaching them to read these texts critically, rather than simply absorb them, is an act of educational justice. Be sensitive to the fact that some texts — religious, traditional, or government-issued — may feel untouchable in your context. Critical literacy does not require attacking any text. It requires reading carefully and asking honest questions. Frame this as respect for the text, not disrespect.
I chose an advertisement for a skin-lightening cream that appeared on a local billboard. The advertisement wants me to think that lighter skin is more beautiful and more successful — it shows a woman with light skin looking confident and happy at work. The perspective is that of the company selling the product, which benefits financially from making people feel their natural appearance is not good enough. The advertisement does not include women with dark skin in positive roles — they are absent or appear in before pictures showing dissatisfaction. This advertisement serves the interests of the company by creating insecurity, and it causes harm to people whose natural skin is darker by telling them, without using those words, that they are less beautiful and less successful.
Award marks for: a genuine and specific text — not a vague or invented one; answers to all four questions that go beyond surface description to analysis; identification of whose interests are served that goes beyond the obvious — not just the company wants money but a more specific account of how the text creates the conditions for that; and some account of the effect on readers. Strong answers will notice that harm can be caused by texts that are not intentionally malicious — the billboard is not evil, but its effects are real.
Original text: a well-known proverb from our region that says a woman's greatest achievement is to raise good children. Counter-narrative (spoken by a woman in the community): I love my children more than anything. But I also spent twelve years learning to be a nurse, and every day I treat people who would die without my skill. My children are proud of me, and I am proud of them — but my achievement is not only theirs. I am a person with a mind and a calling, not only a mother. When people recite this proverb, they mean well. But they are also telling my daughters that their greatest ambition should be someone else's success. I want my daughters to know that their own lives are their achievement too. What the counter-narrative adds: it makes visible the experience of women who have professional identities and ambitions that exist alongside, not instead of, their roles as mothers. What both together reveal: the proverb reflects a genuine value — the importance of raising children well — but it was created in a context where women had few other recognised roles. Both versions together show how a value can be true in one context and limiting in another.
Award marks for: a genuine and specific source text; a counter-narrative that is authentically imagined from the chosen perspective — not just a rebuttal but a genuine voice; a reflection that identifies what the counter-narrative adds rather than simply saying the original is wrong; and a two-versions-together insight that is genuinely more complex than either alone. Strong answers will show empathy for both the original text and the counter-narrative — understanding that both reflect real human experience and values, without flattening the tension between them.
Critical literacy means distrusting everything and believing nothing.
Critical literacy is not cynicism. It is careful, engaged reading that asks honest questions. A critical reader can find a text valuable, beautiful, or true AND still notice whose perspective it reflects and whose it excludes. The goal is not to reject texts but to read them more fully — which often means appreciating them more deeply, not less.
Textbooks and official texts are neutral and objective.
All texts — including textbooks, government documents, and official histories — are produced by people with particular perspectives, in particular contexts, for particular purposes. A textbook that describes the same historical event differently from how the affected community would describe it is making a choice. Noticing this is not disrespectful — it is honest.
If something is biased, it has no value and should be rejected.
All texts have some bias because all texts have a perspective — there is no view from nowhere. A biased text can still be valuable, interesting, or partially true. What matters is reading it with awareness of its perspective, supplementing it with other perspectives, and not accepting it as the complete or only truth.
Critical literacy is only relevant to written texts — news, books, and media.
Critical literacy applies to all texts — oral stories, songs, proverbs, images, gestures, and silences. In many low-resource communities, oral and visual texts are the primary media. These carry just as much constructed meaning, serve just as many interests, and deserve just as much critical attention as written texts.
Critical literacy at secondary level requires engagement with the theoretical frameworks that explain why texts look the way they do — discourse, ideology, representation, and power — as well as the practical tools to apply these frameworks to real texts. Discourse refers to the ways of thinking, speaking, and representing the world that are associated with particular social positions and institutions. Dominant discourses — the ways of describing the world that seem natural, obvious, or common sense — are often those that serve the interests of powerful groups. Critical literacy makes these discourses visible so they can be examined rather than simply absorbed. Ideology is the system of beliefs and values that a text assumes or promotes — often invisibly. An advertisement does not say you are inadequate without our product — it shows images and uses language that produce this feeling in the reader. A history textbook does not say the colonisers were right — it simply describes events from their perspective as if that is the only perspective that exists. Making ideology visible is one of the central tasks of critical literacy. Representation and power are deeply connected. Groups that control the production of texts — newspapers, textbooks, films, government communications — have the power to shape how other groups are seen. In postcolonial contexts, this is especially important: many texts that students encounter were produced by or within frameworks shaped by colonial power. Reading these texts critically — appreciating their content while naming their perspective and its origins — is both an intellectual and a political act. Reading against the grain means refusing the reading position a text offers — noticing what the text assumes about you as a reader and choosing not to occupy that position. A student reading a history textbook that describes their ancestors as primitive or backward can choose to read against this framing — to ask who wrote this, from what position, and what is not being said. This is an act of intellectual resistance that requires skill and practice. In many communities, the ability to read official, legal, medical, and political texts critically is a survival skill. Teaching secondary students to analyse these texts — to notice what rights they grant and what they withhold, what they promise and what they conceal — is an act of educational justice.
Text chosen: a mobile loan advertisement distributed by SMS in our area. Surface meaning: the advertisement offers fast loans of up to a certain amount, approved in minutes, repayable over thirty days. It uses words like freedom, opportunity, and your money now. Assumptions: the advertisement assumes that the reader needs money urgently, that the speed of access is more important than the cost, and that borrowing is a solution to financial difficulty rather than a potential deepening of it. It assumes a reader who is financially pressured and may be making a decision quickly without comparing options. Whose perspective: the advertisement was produced by a financial company whose interest is in generating loan agreements at the highest possible interest rate. The interest rate — which in similar products is often above 300 percent annually — is either absent from the SMS or stated in terms the reader is unlikely to calculate. Who is absent: the borrower who cannot repay is completely absent — there is no mention of consequences for non-payment, penalty fees, or the effect on the borrower's financial situation over time. The advertisement presents only the moment of accessing money, not the months that follow. Effect of uncritical reading: a reader who accepts this text at face value may take a loan believing it offers freedom and opportunity, without calculating the true cost or understanding their obligations if they cannot repay. The language of empowerment — your money now, you deserve this — conceals a transaction that may significantly worsen the reader's financial situation.
Award marks for: a genuine and specific text of community relevance — not a vague or generic example; surface comprehension that is accurate and concise; identification of hidden assumptions that goes beyond the obvious; a specific account of whose interests the text serves and how the text serves those interests; a genuinely significant absent perspective; and a realistic and specific account of the effect on an uncritical reader. Strong answers will show that ideological analysis is not the same as saying the text is bad or wrong — a loan advertisement may serve some readers well. The analysis should be about what the text does, not simply whether it is good or evil.
Critical literacy means rejecting traditional and cultural texts as tools of oppression.
Critical literacy is a tool for reading all texts carefully — including traditional and cultural ones. Many traditional texts carry genuine wisdom, community values, and historical knowledge. Reading them critically means appreciating what they offer while also noticing what assumptions they carry and whose perspectives they reflect. This is an act of deep engagement, not rejection.
Since all texts have a perspective, no text can be trusted and all readings are equally valid.
Recognising that all texts have a perspective does not make all perspectives equally valid or all readings equally accurate. Some texts are more carefully evidenced, more inclusive of multiple perspectives, and more honest about their own position than others. Critical literacy helps us make these distinctions — it does not collapse them.
Critical literacy is a Western academic concept that does not apply to our context.
Practices of critical reading, questioning official accounts, and telling counter-narratives exist in every culture and have existed throughout history. Griots, praise singers, satirical oral traditions, and community storytellers have always performed critical functions — questioning power, preserving suppressed histories, and giving voice to marginalised perspectives. Critical literacy gives formal language to practices that communities have always used.
Only educated or intelligent people can read texts critically.
Critical literacy is a learnable set of habits and questions, not a natural ability that some people have and others lack. Communities without formal education have always read texts critically — they questioned the accounts given by authorities, noticed whose stories were told and whose were not, and created counter-narratives. Formal critical literacy education extends and systematises abilities that already exist.
Key texts and resources: Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed (1968) — the foundational text connecting literacy to liberation and to reading the word and the world simultaneously; essential background for any teacher of critical literacy. Allan Luke and Peter Freebody's Four Resources Model (1990) — a widely used framework describing four roles of the reader: code breaker, meaning maker, text user, and text critic. Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, The Danger of a Single Story (TED Talk, 2009) — freely available online, accessible to secondary students, and directly applicable to the representation questions in this unit. Ngugi wa Thiong'o, Decolonising the Mind (1986) — on the politics of language and representation in postcolonial Africa; Chapter 1 is accessible to strong secondary students. For media literacy specifically: the News Literacy Project (newslit.org) and Media Literacy Now both provide free resources. For propaganda analysis: the First World War propaganda archives held by major universities are freely available online and contain powerful teaching examples. For legal and document literacy in community contexts: Plain Language International (plainlanguage.gov and plainlanguagenetwork.org) provides guidance on reading and writing plain language versions of official documents. For African contexts specifically: the work of Achille Mbembe on postcolonial theory, and of Tsitsi Dangarembga on representation in literature, are valuable supplements to Western critical literacy frameworks.
Your feedback helps other teachers and helps us improve TeachAnyClass.