All Thinkers

Alice Wong

Alice Wong was an American disability activist, writer, and editor. She founded the Disability Visibility Project, which gathered and amplified the stories of disabled people across the United States. She was born on 27 March 1974 in Indianapolis, Indiana. Her parents had immigrated from Hong Kong. Alice was their eldest daughter. She had a genetic neuromuscular condition from childhood. Over her life, her muscles grew weaker. She used a powered wheelchair and, in her later years, a device to help her breathe. She described herself sometimes as a 'cyborg', reclaiming the machines that kept her alive as part of her identity rather than a sad necessity. She studied English and sociology at Indiana University and later earned a master's in medical sociology from the University of California, San Francisco. She lived in San Francisco for most of her adult life. She worked at UCSF as a research associate for over ten years, studying health care for disabled people. In 2013, President Obama appointed her to the National Council on Disability, a federal body that advises the US government. In 2015, she took part in a White House ceremony for the 25th anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act. She attended through a telepresence robot, one of the first public figures to do so. Obama waved at her robot on camera. In 2014 she founded the Disability Visibility Project with StoryCorps, a non-profit oral history group. Over the following decade she built a huge body of work: anthologies of disabled writers, podcasts, campaigns, and a memoir called Year of the Tiger (2022). In 2024, the MacArthur Foundation named her one of their fellows, an award often called a 'genius grant'. She died in a San Francisco hospital from an infection on 14 November 2025, aged 51.

Origin
United States
Lifespan
1974-2025
Era
Early 21st Century
Subjects
Disability Rights Activism Oral History Storytelling Public Policy
Why They Matter

Alice Wong matters for three reasons. First, she built a space where disabled people could tell their own stories. For much of history, stories about disabled people were told by others. Non-disabled writers described disabled lives as tragic or inspiring, often getting the reality wrong. Wong's Disability Visibility Project did something different. It put microphones, keyboards, and publishing platforms in disabled hands. Hundreds of disabled people recorded their own oral histories, wrote their own essays, and ran their own campaigns through her networks. The result was not one story but many. Her anthologies and podcasts showed the full range of disabled life: Asian disabled life, Black disabled life, queer disabled life, poor disabled life, and many more.

Second, she made clear that disability connects to every other justice issue. Many activists treat disability as a separate topic. Wong insisted it cuts across all the others. The Covid-19 pandemic, which started in 2020, proved her point. Disabled people died at much higher rates. Public health policies often treated them as acceptable losses. Wong refused this. She pushed back in public writing and in direct political action. In 2023, she co-founded Crips for eSims for Gaza, which raised over three million dollars to keep Palestinians in Gaza connected to the internet during war. A disability activist working on Gaza might seem surprising. For Wong, it was obvious. Any group treated as disposable was her concern.

Third, she lived openly with serious illness and kept working through it. Her body got weaker through the years. She had several close brushes with death. She kept writing and organising. Her final message to her community, written before her death and released afterwards, called herself their 'ancestor' and promised that 'disabled oracles' would light the way forward. She showed that a life shaped by serious illness was not a lesser life. It could be a rich, demanding, beautiful life. For her communities, her death was a huge loss. The work she built keeps going.

Key Ideas
1
Disabled People Telling Their Own Stories
2
Disability Is Not Just Tragedy
3
The Cyborg Self
Key Quotations
"Disability is so much more than pain, trauma and tragedy. There's creativity, adaptation, and talent that comes from living in a non-disabled world."
— MacArthur Foundation Fellowship video, 2024
Wong is pushing back against the common idea that disabled lives are mostly suffering. Yes, there is pain. Yes, there are hard parts. But a disabled life also contains creativity, adaptation, and particular talents that come from navigating a world not built for you. Disabled people often find clever solutions, build strong communities, and develop perspectives non-disabled people lack. Reducing the whole experience to 'pain and tragedy' is not kind. It is a way of not seeing real lives. For students, the quote is a useful check on assumptions. When you picture a disabled person's life, what do you imagine? Does your picture match Wong's fuller one?
"Storytelling is a powerful form of resistance."
— MacArthur Foundation Fellowship video, 2024
Wong believed that telling the truth about your life, in your own voice, was a political act. When a group has been ignored, mocked, or simplified by others, telling your own story breaks through. It refuses the simple version. It insists on complexity. It gives other people in your group someone to see themselves in. Wong built her career on this principle. The Disability Visibility Project collected thousands of such stories. Each one was a small act of resistance against the idea that disabled lives were less real or less valuable. For students, the idea applies beyond disability. Any cause you care about can be advanced by helping people tell their real stories, not by arguing with statistics alone.
Using This Thinker in the Classroom
Cultural Heritage and Identity When discussing how groups are represented in media
How to introduce
Ask students how disabled people usually appear in films, books, and news stories. Many will say as tragic figures or as inspirational heroes. Share Wong's claim that these two frames miss most of real disabled life. Discuss: what is the difference between telling your own story and having someone else tell it about you? This is a useful exercise for thinking about any group that has been mostly described by outsiders. The same questions apply to immigrants, working-class people, religious minorities, and others.
Creative Expression When teaching students that stories can be political
How to introduce
Share Wong's line: 'storytelling is a powerful form of resistance.' Ask students to think of a story (from a book, film, or personal life) that changed how they thought about a group of people. Often a single story does more than a hundred statistics. Wong built her career on this. If students are planning any kind of campaign or project, telling real stories is often the strongest move. This is practical advice with a deep principle behind it.
Further Reading

For a first introduction, Wong's memoir Year of the Tiger: An Activist's Life (2022) is funny, sharp, and accessible. Her anthology Disability Visibility: First-Person Stories from the Twenty-First Century (2020) gives many entry points through short essays by different disabled writers. A young adult version, Disability Visibility: 17 First-Person Stories for Today (2021), is shorter and suitable for younger readers. The MacArthur Foundation video profile from 2024 is a clear short introduction.

Key Ideas
1
Disability Justice, Not Just Disability Rights
2
Covid-19 and Disposable People
3
Storytelling as Activism
Key Quotations
"It is the epitome of privilege when people say they are non-political."
— Public lectures and writing, quoted in University of Alberta Visiting Lectureship profile, 2024-2025
Wong is making a sharp point. Some people say they are not political. They avoid political topics, do not vote, or do not want their art or conversations to touch politics. Wong's response: this attitude is itself a privilege. You can stay out of politics only if politics does not seriously affect your daily life. A disabled woman depending on government programs for personal care assistance cannot be non-political. Her daily survival depends on political decisions. The same is true for many immigrants, poor people, and others whose lives are directly shaped by state action. For intermediate students, the quote challenges a common attitude. Being 'not political' often means being in a position where politics does not hurt you enough to force your attention.
"Our wisdom is incisive and unflinching. I'm honored to be your ancestor."
— Final message released by her friend Sandy Ho after Wong's death, November 2025
This is from Wong's letter to her community, written before her death and released afterwards. She calls herself their ancestor. The word is deliberate. An ancestor is someone who came before, whose work made your life possible, and to whom you owe something. Wong is claiming a place in this long chain. She is also placing disabled people inside it, saying that disabled wisdom has always been there and will continue. 'Incisive and unflinching' describes her own style. Sharp, direct, not softening hard truths. For intermediate students, the line is worth holding. It reframes death. Wong did not write 'I will miss you' or 'goodbye'. She wrote 'I am honored to be your ancestor'. Death is real, but the work continues, and the person who did it takes a lasting place.
Using This Thinker in the Classroom
Ethical Thinking When discussing how societies decide whose lives count
How to introduce
Share Wong's writing about disabled people being treated as 'disposable' during Covid-19. Discuss carefully: when a society has to make hard choices, who gets protected? Who gets left out? The answer is rarely said openly. It is shown in policies and priorities. Wong's analysis helps students see patterns others miss. This is a mature discussion suitable for older students. It applies beyond disability to many other issues in current events.
Critical Thinking When teaching students to connect different social issues
How to introduce
Wong connected disability to race, class, gender, immigration, and even war. Some people found this strange. Why would a disability activist work on Gaza? Share her thinking: wherever groups are treated as disposable, the logic is related. Discuss with students: can social issues really be kept separate? Or do they share structures? This is a careful conversation. Students can reach different conclusions. The mature answer is usually that issues are both distinct and connected, and good activists learn to see both.
Emotional Intelligence When discussing living with serious illness or disability
How to introduce
This is a careful conversation. Share Wong's cyborg framing. She used machines to breathe, move, and communicate. She treated them as part of who she was, not as embarrassing or sad. Ask students: how do we talk about people who use assistive devices? Glasses. Hearing aids. Wheelchairs. Breathing machines. Wong's framing is useful for everyone. The things that help you live are part of you. For students who themselves live with disabilities or chronic illness, this can be affirming. For others, it changes how they see disabled people in their own communities.
Further Reading

For deeper reading, her second anthology, Disability Intimacy: Essays on Love, Care, and Desire (2024), extends the work into new areas. Her 2018 collection Resistance and Hope: Essays by Disabled People is freely available online. The Disability Visibility Project podcast archive includes over 100 conversations. For the wider disability justice movement she worked within, Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha's Care Work is an important companion.

Key Ideas
1
Crips for eSims for Gaza
2
The Ancestor Letter
3
The Line from Heumann to Wong
Key Quotations
"There are so few spaces for us in bias."
— MacArthur Foundation Fellowship video, 2024
The phrase 'in bias' is worth sitting with. Wong is not saying the world hates disabled people. She is saying the world is built with assumptions (biases) that quietly exclude them. Step into a publishing industry. Where are the disabled editors? Step into a film studio. Where are the disabled writers? Step into an award ceremony. Where are the disabled prize-winners? The exclusion is not dramatic. It is steady and systemic. Wong's work aimed to change this, not by waiting to be invited but by building new spaces. The Disability Visibility Project. The anthologies. The podcasts. The BIPOC Disabled Filmmakers Coalition she helped found. Each was a space where disabled people could work without fighting the bias at every turn. For advanced students, the strategy is important. Sometimes you cannot wait for existing institutions to change. You have to build new ones.
"Don't let the bastards grind you down."
— Final message to her community, released November 2025
Wong ended her final letter with this borrowed phrase. The Latin form, 'nolite te bastardes carborundorum', is a famous line from Margaret Atwood's novel The Handmaid's Tale. Atwood invented it as a fake piece of Latin graffiti left by a woman resisting an oppressive regime. The phrase has become a motto for many activists facing long struggles. Wong used it in her last words. She was telling her community not to let cruelty, indifference, or exhaustion wear them down. The work was hard. It would stay hard. Keep going anyway. For advanced students, the line is worth holding. It does not promise that things will get easier. It asks for persistence in conditions that may not improve soon. Many movements need this kind of tough encouragement. Wong gave it to hers.
Using This Thinker in the Classroom
Ethical Thinking When discussing how activists think about their own deaths
How to introduce
Share Wong's final letter, released after her death in November 2025. She called herself her community's ancestor. She did not express self-pity. She thanked her community and told them to keep going. Discuss with students: how can someone face an early death this way? What kind of life prepares you to die well? This is a serious conversation, suitable only for older students and only when handled with care. Wong is an example of a person who did not have long life but had full life.
Cultural Heritage and Identity When teaching students about lines of activism across generations
How to introduce
Show students the line from Judith Heumann (died 2023) to Harriet McBryde Johnson (died 2008) to Alice Wong (died 2025). Three women. Three different approaches to disability rights: legal reform, philosophical argument, cultural storytelling. All three died in their 50s or early 70s. None lived long. Each built on the previous. Discuss: how do movements move across generations? What gets lost when a major figure dies young? What gets passed on? Wong's explicit 'ancestor' framing in her final letter is part of this conversation. She saw herself as passing the work on.
Common Misconceptions
Common misconception

Alice Wong's activism was mainly about physical accessibility, like ramps and wider doors.

What to teach instead

Access matters, but it was a small part of her focus. Wong worked on storytelling, cultural visibility, policy, coalition-building, and disability justice across many fields. She edited anthologies, ran a podcast, built online communities, advised the White House, and raised millions for phone access in Gaza. The older disability rights movement often focused on legal access. The disability justice movement Wong helped lead is broader. It asks who gets to be seen, whose stories count, and how disability connects to every other social issue.

Common misconception

Wong's work was inspiring to non-disabled people because of what she overcame.

What to teach instead

She rejected this framing consistently. Treating a disabled person's life as inspiring because of what they 'overcome' usually reduces the person to a lesson for non-disabled readers. Wong did not want to be inspirational. She wanted to be seen as a full person, an editor, a writer, a political actor, a friend, a columnist, a cat owner. Her work was for disabled communities first. It reached non-disabled readers too, but not as 'inspiration'. The inspiration framing is one of the things disability activists have long pushed back on. Reading Wong as inspirational content misses her own clear objections to this label.

Common misconception

The Disability Visibility Project was Alice Wong speaking for disabled people.

What to teach instead

It was the opposite. The Project existed so that many disabled people could speak for themselves. Wong built and curated the space. She did not put herself at the centre of every story. Her anthologies collect dozens of other voices. Her podcast interviews many guests. Her oral history work records thousands of other lives. Wong was clear about this. She did not want a 'super-crip' pedestal. She wanted a chorus. Reading her as the voice of disability misses the whole design of her work. She was a platform-builder, not a single spokesperson.

Common misconception

Because Wong died young, her life was tragic.

What to teach instead

She died at 51, earlier than most in the United States. But she lived fully. She built a major movement. She edited books that changed publishing. She received major awards. She had deep friendships. She mentored many people. Her final letter refused the tragic framing explicitly. Reading her life as 'tragic because short' falls into exactly the pattern she spent her career pushing against. A life can be rich without being long. Wong's life was rich. Her death is a loss. The two things can both be true without making her life a tragedy.

Intellectual Connections
Develops
Judith Heumann
Heumann led the first generation of American disability rights activists. She fought for legal rights: the 1977 Section 504 sit-in, the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act. Wong built on this foundation. Her work extended the movement from legal rights to cultural visibility, storytelling, and the disability justice framework. The two knew each other and respected each other. Heumann died in March 2023. Wong died in November 2025. In their careers, they represented two phases of the same long struggle. Reading them together shows how a movement grows across generations.
Develops
Harriet McBryde Johnson
McBryde Johnson had defended disabled people's lives through philosophical argument, especially against the bioethicist Peter Singer. Wong did similar work through storytelling and platform building. Both refused the 'tragic or inspiring' binary. Both wrote about their own bodies honestly, with humour and without shame. Both died relatively young, McBryde Johnson at 50 in 2008, Wong at 51 in 2025. Wong read and admired McBryde Johnson's work and included pieces by thinkers in her tradition in her anthologies. Reading them together shows two disabled writers using different tools for overlapping goals.
Complements
Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui
Rivera Cusicanqui, the Bolivian sociologist, argues that oral history is a valuable form of knowledge, especially for groups excluded from official records. Wong built her whole project on this principle. Both women created platforms where marginalised people could tell their own stories in their own words. Both treated their communities as sources of wisdom, not subjects for outside study. The contexts are different: Indigenous Andean life and American disabled life. The method is related. Both insisted on 'nothing about us without us', though Rivera Cusicanqui did not use that exact phrase.
In Dialogue With
Audre Lorde
Lorde wrote about her own body, her Black lesbian identity, and her cancer with honest, sharp prose. She insisted on naming what others avoided. Wong's work carries forward this tradition into disability writing. Both women built community through writing. Both insisted that silence about what you are does not protect you. Lorde died in 1992. Wong was a young woman then. She read Lorde's work and kept the method alive in a different context. The line from Lorde's essays to Wong's anthologies is real.
Complements
Malala Yousafzai
Malala built a platform for girls' education. Wong built a platform for disabled voices. Both women used storytelling as a central tool. Both connected their specific cause to wider issues. Both were public figures who had to deal with fame and what it does to activist work. Wong was the older of the two and worked in a different country and context. But the basic move, create a platform, amplify others, connect to larger justice struggles, is shared. Reading them together shows two contemporary activists using related methods on different causes.
Complements
Robin Wall Kimmerer
Kimmerer, the Potawatomi botanist, writes about Indigenous knowledge as valuable on its own terms, not just as folklore. Wong did similar work for disability knowledge. Both women pushed against the assumption that mainstream institutions had the only real knowledge. Both treated their own communities as sources of wisdom about how to live well. The worlds they describe are very different: one rooted in land and plants, the other in urban American disability community. The move, respect non-mainstream knowledge as real knowledge, is the same.
Further Reading

For research-level engagement, Wong's Teen Vogue columns and her pieces for platforms like The New York Times archive her sharpest political writing. The Crips for eSims for Gaza project records (available online) document her later coalition-building. For scholarly engagement with disability justice, Alison Kafer's Feminist, Queer, Crip is a major academic study. For Wong's death and legacy, the Laura Flanders Show conversations with Sandy Ho and other collaborators in March 2026 give a first long reflection from her closest colleagues.