All Thinkers

Cicero

Marcus Tullius Cicero was a Roman lawyer, statesman, philosopher, and writer. He is one of the most influential figures in the history of Western law and political thought. He was born on 3 January 106 BCE in Arpinum, a small town about 70 miles south-east of Rome. His family was wealthy but not noble. They belonged to the equestrian class, the second tier of Roman society below the senators. His parents wanted him to rise. They sent him to Rome and then to Greece for the best education available. He studied law, rhetoric (the art of public speaking), and philosophy. By his mid-twenties he was working as a lawyer in Rome. He rose quickly. He became famous for his speeches in court cases. In 63 BCE, at the age of 43, he was elected consul, the highest political office in Rome. That year he uncovered the Catiline Conspiracy, a plot to overthrow the Roman state. The Senate executed the conspirators on Cicero's authority. The Romans gave him the title 'Father of the Country'. His later career was difficult. He was exiled briefly in 58 BCE. The Roman Republic was collapsing. Julius Caesar took dictatorial power. After Caesar was assassinated in 44 BCE, Cicero attacked Mark Antony in a series of fierce speeches called the Philippics. Antony, Octavian, and Lepidus formed the Second Triumvirate and made lists of enemies to be killed. Cicero was on the list. He was caught and executed on 7 December 43 BCE, aged 63. His severed head and hands were displayed in the Roman Forum.

Origin
Roman Republic (Italy)
Lifespan
106-43 BCE
Era
Ancient
Subjects
Roman Law Natural Law Rhetoric Philosophy Political Thought
Why They Matter

Cicero matters for three reasons. First, he shaped Western thinking about law itself. He developed the idea of natural law, a higher standard of justice that exists independently of any government's specific laws. Even rulers, he argued, are bound by it. A ruler who breaks natural law is a tyrant, even if their actions are technically legal. This idea has shaped Western legal thinking for over two thousand years. The American Founders, the French revolutionaries, and many modern human rights documents draw on it. The principle that some laws are above other laws traces back substantially to Cicero.

Second, he was Rome's greatest orator and one of history's finest legal advocates. He left behind 88 speeches and many books on the art of public speaking. For two thousand years, lawyers and politicians studied his methods. His way of constructing arguments, of moving an audience, of weaving evidence and emotion together, shaped the practice of law and politics in Europe and beyond.

Third, he carried Greek philosophy into Latin and into the future. The great schools of Greek thought (Stoicism, Platonism, Epicureanism, Scepticism) might have been lost to Western Europe without him. He read them, summarised them in Latin, and adapted them for Roman readers. Many of the philosophical terms now used in English, French, German, and other European languages come from Cicero's Latin translations of Greek words. Without him, much of ancient philosophy would not have reached the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, or the modern world.

Key Ideas
1
Natural Law: Some Laws Are Above Other Laws
2
The Art of the Lawyer
3
We Are Not Born for Ourselves Alone
Key Quotations
"The safety of the people shall be the highest law."
— On the Laws (De Legibus), III.3, c. 52-51 BCE
This famous Latin maxim, salus populi suprema lex esto, is one of Cicero's clearest statements about the purpose of government. The state exists to keep its people safe and well. Any law that fails this test is failing its job. The line has been engraved on courthouses, used in modern constitutions, and quoted in countless political speeches. It also raises hard questions. What counts as safety? Whose safety? Who decides? Cicero himself acted on the principle when he ordered the Catiline conspirators executed without trial in 63 BCE, claiming the safety of the Republic required it. For students, the line is foundational. It also shows how high principles need careful application. Used wisely, it protects the public good. Used poorly, it can justify almost anything.
"We are not born for ourselves alone; our country, our friends, claim a share in us."
— On Duties (De Officiis), I.22, 44 BCE
Cicero argues here that human beings are not isolated individuals. We belong to families, friendships, and communities. They have legitimate claims on us. We owe them part of our time, energy, and concern. The view shaped Western civic thinking for centuries. Modern arguments about civic duty, voting, jury service, and contributing to society draw on it. The line also pushes against extreme individualism. We do not exist purely for our own pleasure or profit. We are part of larger communities, and our flourishing depends on serving them. For students, the line is a useful corrective to many modern messages about self-fulfilment. Real fulfilment, Cicero suggests, is partly a matter of giving.
Using This Thinker in the Classroom
Cultural Heritage and Identity When introducing students to ancient Rome
How to introduce
Many students associate ancient Rome with emperors, gladiators, and the Colosseum. Tell them about Cicero. He lived in the late Roman Republic, before the empire. He was a lawyer, a politician, a philosopher, and a writer. He left behind speeches, essays, and letters that we still read 2,000 years later. He was killed for his political work in 43 BCE. His ideas about law and government have shaped the modern world. Roman history is more than soldiers and emperors. It is also lawyers, philosophers, and writers like Cicero.
Critical Thinking When teaching students about persuasion
How to introduce
Cicero was famous for his speeches. He convinced juries to acquit clients. He convinced the Senate to take action. He convinced ordinary Romans to support political causes. Discuss with students: what makes a speech persuasive? Cicero said good speakers know their subject deeply, understand their audience, use evidence carefully, and do not lie. Bad speakers manipulate emotions for selfish ends. The distinction still matters. Modern public speaking, courtroom advocacy, and political communication still draw on Cicero's principles. Ask students to think of speakers they find persuasive and apply Cicero's tests.
Ethical Thinking When discussing duty to community
How to introduce
Cicero believed people are not born for themselves alone. They owe duty to family, friends, country, and community. Discuss with students: do you agree? What duties do students think they have to their family? To their school? To their country? To people they will never meet? Modern individualism often suggests we just owe ourselves. Cicero pushed back. Real flourishing, he thought, requires giving as well as receiving. This is a useful conversation about how to think about civic life from the very start of education.
Further Reading

For a first introduction, Anthony Everitt's Cicero: The Life and Times of Rome's Greatest Politician (2002) is widely admired as a readable popular biography. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy both have substantial articles on Cicero, freely available online. For a quick overview of his ideas, the Penguin Classics On Duties (translated by Walter Miller or in the Cambridge translation by Margaret Atkins) is a good starting point. Many of his speeches and letters are available in good modern translations.

Key Ideas
1
On Duties (De Officiis): The Ethics Manual
2
The Defence of the Republic
3
Rhetoric: How to Persuade Without Lying
Key Quotations
"Where there is a society of free men, there is a balance of liberty and law."
— Paraphrased from On the Republic and On the Laws
Cicero believed liberty and law must balance each other. Pure liberty without law leads to chaos, where the strong dominate the weak. Pure law without liberty leads to tyranny, where rulers crush their citizens. A free society needs both. Citizens enjoy real freedoms; those freedoms are bounded and protected by laws everyone, including rulers, must obey. The idea is the foundation of constitutional government. The American Constitution, the French Declaration of the Rights of Man, and many modern legal systems try to maintain exactly this balance. For students, the line is a useful summary of one of the core ideas of Western political thought. Liberty and law are not opposites. They depend on each other.
"True law is right reason, in agreement with nature, universal, unchanging, eternal."
— Paraphrased from On the Republic, III.33, c. 51 BCE
This is one of the clearest statements of natural law in ancient writing. True law, Cicero says, is not just whatever a government has written down. It is rooted in human reason and in the natural order of things. It applies to everyone everywhere. It does not change with fashion or political mood. The view has been hugely influential. Christian thinkers like Thomas Aquinas built theology on it. American revolutionaries like Jefferson echoed it in the Declaration of Independence ('Laws of Nature and of Nature's God'). Modern human rights documents draw on it. For intermediate students, the line is the foundation of an enormous amount of later political and legal thought. Whether or not we accept its full metaphysics, the practical effect is real.
Using This Thinker in the Classroom
Critical Thinking When teaching students about natural law
How to introduce
Cicero said there are some laws above governmental laws. Murder, theft, and tyranny are wrong, even if a government legalises them. Some rights belong to all human beings, no matter what laws say. Discuss with students: does this make sense? Where do these higher laws come from? Cicero said reason and nature. Religious thinkers later said God. Modern thinkers say something like shared moral intuitions. Natural law remains controversial. But the basic idea, that some standards are above any specific government, has shaped human rights thinking for two thousand years.
Ethical Thinking When discussing emergency powers and the rule of law
How to introduce
In 63 BCE, Cicero ordered the execution of Roman citizens without a regular trial because he believed they were planning to overthrow the state. Was this right? Romans gave him the title 'Father of the Country'. Five years later, his enemies exiled him for the same act. Discuss with students: when, if ever, should normal legal protections be suspended? Modern democracies face this question often. Anti-terrorism laws, emergency powers during pandemics, treatment of suspected enemies of the state. Cicero's case is one of the clearest early examples of the dilemma. There is no easy answer.
Further Reading

For deeper reading, the Loeb Classical Library editions of Cicero's complete works are widely available with Latin originals and English translations on facing pages. Mary Beard's SPQR (2015) places Cicero in his Roman context. Kathryn Tempest's Cicero: Politics and Persuasion in Ancient Rome (2011) is a strong modern biography. For Cicero on philosophy specifically, James Powell's edited Cicero the Philosopher gathers important scholarly essays. Walter Nicgorski's writings examine Cicero's relevance to modern political thought.

Key Ideas
1
The Catiline Conspiracy and Its Aftermath
2
What Cicero Got Wrong
3
How Cicero Has Been Used and Misused
Key Quotations
"There is nothing proper about what you are doing, soldier, but do try to kill me properly."
— Cicero's reported last words, December 43 BCE, recorded by Plutarch
According to Plutarch's later biography, these were Cicero's last words. He was 63. Soldiers sent by Mark Antony had caught up with him as he tried to flee Italy. He stretched out his neck calmly and asked them to do their work cleanly. The line is striking for its dignity in the face of death. After a lifetime of giving speeches, his last words showed the same care and discipline. The line also captures something essential about him. He died because of words he had written, the Philippic speeches against Antony. He died still maintaining standards of conduct. For advanced students, the line is a moving end to a great career. It also shows that he died as he had lived: as a Roman who took form and dignity seriously.
"The good of the people is the chief law."
— On the Laws, III.3, c. 52-51 BCE; another translation of the same maxim
This is another translation of the famous salus populi suprema lex esto, mentioned earlier. It captures the maxim slightly differently. The 'good' of the people, not just their 'safety', is what law exists to serve. Modern readers may notice the gap between the two translations. The Latin word salus can mean safety, security, welfare, well-being, or salvation. Different translations bring out different aspects. The richness of the original is lost in any single English version. For advanced students, this is a useful reminder. Reading old texts in translation always involves choices. Different translators interpret old words differently. Where possible, looking at multiple translations gives a fuller picture. Where not possible, awareness of the limits of any one translation is part of careful reading.
Using This Thinker in the Classroom
Ethical Thinking When discussing how to evaluate flawed historical figures
How to introduce
Cicero is widely admired. He was also a slave-owner who never questioned slavery, an elitist who feared the poor, and a politician who compromised his principles when useful. Discuss with students: how do we evaluate complicated historical figures? It is wrong to dismiss everything Cicero did because he had moral failings shared by his entire society. It is also wrong to ignore the failings to keep him as a clean hero. The honest middle path is harder. We can admire what is admirable while noting what is troubling. The same approach applies to many other historical figures, including some students may have been taught to revere uncritically.
Cultural Heritage and Identity When discussing how ancient ideas shape modern thinking
How to introduce
Many ideas in modern democracy go back to Cicero. The rule of law. Natural rights. Civic duty. The dangerous of tyranny. Eloquence as a virtue. The American Founders, especially John Adams, knew Cicero almost by heart. Discuss with students: when an idea has been shaping a culture for 2,000 years, how do we evaluate it? Has it become so embedded that we forget where it came from? Are there parts that still need updating? Cicero is a useful case for this kind of thinking. His ideas live in the air around us, even when we have never read him.
Common Misconceptions
Common misconception

Cicero invented natural law.

What to teach instead

He did not. Greek thinkers, especially the Stoics, had developed parts of the idea before him. Cicero gave it the clearest expression in Latin and made it part of the Western tradition. He summarised, refined, and transmitted ideas that became foundational. Calling him the inventor of natural law overstates his originality. Crediting him with shaping how natural law has come down to us is fair. His role as a great transmitter is more important than any specific philosophical innovation.

Common misconception

Cicero was a pure hero of democracy.

What to teach instead

He was a defender of the Roman Republic, but the Roman Republic was not a democracy in the modern sense. Only adult male citizens could vote. Slaves had no rights. Women had limited rights. The Senate was dominated by wealthy aristocrats. Cicero himself was elitist, suspicious of popular politics, and a slave-owner. He defended a particular kind of mixed government, partly aristocratic, partly democratic, that he and other Romans called 'the Republic'. Reading him as a champion of modern democracy oversimplifies his actual views.

Common misconception

Cicero's philosophy was purely original Roman thought.

What to teach instead

Cicero himself rarely claimed full originality. He took most of his philosophical material from Greek schools (Stoicism, Platonism, Academic Scepticism, and others) and adapted it for Roman readers in Latin. His genius lay in selecting, organising, and translating Greek ideas, not in inventing new ones. Modern readers sometimes underestimate this work. It was an enormous achievement to make Greek philosophy available to Latin-speaking readers and to invent the Latin vocabulary needed to express it. But it was different from creating a new philosophical system.

Common misconception

Cicero's death proves he was a martyr for free speech.

What to teach instead

His death was political, not just intellectual. Antony hated him because Cicero had attacked Antony in fierce speeches and had tried to drive him from power. The killing was revenge for political opposition, not just punishment for words. Modern readers sometimes simplify Cicero into a martyr for free expression. He was actually a politician who lost a political fight. The fact that he lost partly because of his words does not make his death a pure free-speech case. It makes it an example of how violent politics can punish opponents for whatever weapons they used, including speeches.

Intellectual Connections
Develops
Aristotle
Aristotle's political philosophy, especially his idea that humans are by nature political animals, deeply influenced Cicero. Cicero took Aristotle's framework and applied it to Roman conditions. He wrote about the best constitution, the role of citizens, the duties of statesmen. Where Aristotle had written about Greek city-states, Cicero wrote about a much larger Roman state with different challenges. Reading them together gives students a sense of how Greek political theory was adapted to Roman circumstances and then passed on to the Western tradition.
In Dialogue With
Marcus Aurelius
Marcus Aurelius, the Stoic philosopher-emperor of the late second century CE, lived more than two hundred years after Cicero. Both men drew on Stoic philosophy. Both were Romans who tried to live by Stoic principles in positions of public responsibility. Cicero wrote in defence of the Republic; Marcus Aurelius ruled the Empire. Both insisted on personal duty, civic responsibility, and moral seriousness. Reading them together gives students a sense of how Roman Stoicism shaped public life across centuries, even as the political system changed dramatically.
Complements
Confucius
Confucius, working in China nearly four hundred years before Cicero, developed an ethics centred on duty, virtue, and the proper conduct of public life. Cicero, working in a different culture, developed strikingly similar themes. Both believed humans had duties to family, community, and state. Both believed virtue could be taught. Both believed eloquence and moral character should go together in public leaders. Their cultures and contexts were very different, but the parallel is real. Reading them together gives students two great early traditions of public ethics from very different parts of the ancient world.
Anticipates
Thomas Aquinas
Aquinas, the great medieval Christian theologian of the thirteenth century, drew heavily on Cicero's natural law theory and combined it with Christian theology. Aquinas treated Cicero as a major source on ethics, law, and the duties of public life. The whole tradition of Christian natural law thinking, which has shaped Catholic teaching and Western legal philosophy ever since, is built on Cicero's foundation. Reading them together shows how an ancient pagan thinker shaped major Christian thought for over a thousand years after his death.
Anticipates
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Ginsburg, the modern American Supreme Court Justice, worked within a legal tradition built on foundations Cicero helped lay. The American Founders read Cicero. The Constitution they wrote drew on natural law ideas Cicero transmitted. Modern American legal arguments about equal protection, due process, and constitutional rights draw on a tradition that runs from Cicero through Aquinas, Locke, and the Founders to the present day. Ginsburg never claimed to be working in Cicero's tradition. She did not have to. The tradition was already deeply embedded in the law she practised. Reading them together shows how ancient ideas can shape modern legal practice in ways that may not always be visible.
In Dialogue With
Hannah Arendt
Arendt, the twentieth-century political philosopher, wrote extensively about how the Roman Republic shaped Western political thought. She was a serious reader of Cicero and engaged with his ideas about civic duty, the public realm, and the dangers of dictatorship. Both thinkers wrote during periods when democratic institutions were under threat. Cicero died defending the Republic against the rising power of would-be dictators. Arendt wrote in the shadow of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. Reading them together gives students a sense of how the questions Cicero raised remain alive in modern democratic thinking.
Further Reading

For research-level engagement, the Cambridge Companion to Cicero (2013), edited by Catherine Steel, is the major academic reference. Andrew Dyck's commentaries on De Officiis and other works are detailed and authoritative. Malcolm Schofield's Cicero: Political Philosophy (2021) is a strong recent treatment. The journal Ciceroniana On Line publishes ongoing scholarship. For Cicero's reception across the centuries, the Brill Companion to the Reception of Cicero is comprehensive. The Loeb Classical Library remains the standard for working with Cicero's texts in their original Latin.