Julian of Norwich was an English Christian mystic and theologian. She is thought to be the first woman to have written a book in English that has survived. She was born around 1342, probably in or near Norwich, England. Norwich at that time was one of the largest cities in England, a centre of trade and learning. Almost nothing is known about her early life. We do not even know her real name. The name Julian comes from the church of St Julian's in Norwich, where she later lived. In May 1373, when she was thirty years old, she became seriously ill. She thought she was going to die. While she lay close to death, she received a series of sixteen visions, which she called 'showings'. They came to her over the course of a day and night. She recovered from her illness and wrote down what she had seen. This first version is now called the Short Text. She then spent about twenty years thinking about what the visions meant. She became an anchoress. An anchoress was a woman who lived in a small cell attached to a church, dedicated to prayer and spiritual counsel. Her cell had a window onto the church so she could receive communion, and another window onto the street so she could speak with visitors. After two decades of reflection, she wrote a much longer version of her book, the Long Text. It is now called Revelations of Divine Love. She is known to have been alive as late as 1416, when she would have been about 74. She probably died not long after. She was famous enough in her lifetime that the pilgrim and writer Margery Kempe visited her for spiritual advice.
Julian matters for three reasons. First, she is a pioneer of writing in English. Her book is the earliest surviving work in English by a woman. When Julian wrote, most religious writing was in Latin. Latin was the language of priests, scholars, and universities, which excluded women. By writing in English, Julian made serious theology available to ordinary people, including other women. Her language is still beautiful to read today, even as Middle English has become distant.
Second, her theology is original. In a world where many Christian writers focused on sin, hell, and God's anger, Julian insisted that God's deepest nature is love. She wrote that God is never angry. She wrote that sin is necessary but all shall be well. She wrote about Jesus as a mother as well as a father. These ideas were bold in the 14th century. Some of them were at the edge of what the Church allowed. Julian was careful not to be declared a heretic. But she did not soften her vision to fit expectations.
Third, her book has had a long afterlife. It was almost forgotten for centuries. It was rediscovered in the 20th century and has shaped modern theology, poetry, and spiritual life. T.S. Eliot quoted her in the Four Quartets. Iris Murdoch, Denise Levertov, and Rowan Williams have drawn on her. Her most famous phrase, 'all shall be well', has entered the English language as a saying of hope in difficult times. She is one of the few medieval women whose voice speaks directly to readers today.
For a first introduction, read Clifton Wolters's Penguin Classics translation of Revelations of Divine Love. It is clear, accurate, and comes with a helpful introduction. The Short Text is under 12,000 words and can be read in an evening. For biographical context, Amy Frykholm's Julian of Norwich: A Contemplative Biography is accessible and reliable. Denys Turner's Julian of Norwich, Theologian places her in a theological context readers without expertise can follow. The Friends of Julian of Norwich website has well-chosen short introductions. The BBC's In Our Time has an episode on Julian with respected scholars.
For deeper reading, Elizabeth Spearing's Penguin edition of Revelations of Divine Love includes both Short and Long Texts with careful notes.
Mystic and Theologian (1987) is a serious scholarly introduction. Denise Nowakowski Baker's Julian of Norwich's Showings: From Vision to Book examines how Julian developed her thought across the two versions.
Studies in the Spirituality of the High Middle Ages places Julian's mother-imagery in broader medieval context. Barry Windeatt's Oxford World's Classics edition is excellent for studying the Middle English alongside translation.
Julian was a gentle, pious woman with simple comforting messages.
Her reputation can make her sound soft. The reality is tougher. She lived through plague and political violence. Her theology addresses hard questions about suffering, sin, and God's goodness. She developed original ideas that pushed at the edges of Church orthodoxy. She thought carefully for twenty years about a one-day experience. Calling her messages 'simple comforts' underestimates the intellectual work behind them. Julian was a serious theologian, not just a comforting voice.
Calling Jesus 'mother' was a modern idea projected back onto Julian.
It was not. Julian wrote about Jesus as mother in the 14th century. She developed the imagery at length, with careful theological grounding. The idea has medieval precedents in Bernard of Clairvaux and others. It is not a modern imposition. Modern readers have drawn on it, but they did not invent it. Students who encounter this in Julian are meeting a genuinely medieval theological move, not a modern reinterpretation.
Julian was uneducated because she called herself 'a simple creature, unlettered'.
This is a rhetorical move common in medieval religious writing. By saying she was unlearned, Julian protected herself from charges of improperly teaching theology. She also signalled humility, as the culture required. The book itself shows careful theological knowledge, sophisticated Latin concepts rendered in English, and awareness of biblical and theological tradition. Scholars disagree about exactly how formal her education was, but the text itself is evidence that she had access to serious theological thinking. Taking her self-description literally misses the social and literary context.
We know very little about Julian, so her book must tell us very little.
We know almost nothing about her life. But we have around 63,000 words of her thought, carefully developed over twenty years. This makes her, in some ways, better known than writers whose biographies are clear but whose thought is shallow. Julian has given us her theology, her images, her arguments, her voice. The absence of biography is frustrating but should not be confused with absence of content. What we have from her is rich enough to fill a lifetime of reading.
For research-level engagement, the Edmund Colledge and James Walsh scholarly edition A Book of Showings to the Anchoress Julian of Norwich (1978, two volumes) remains a standard. Nicholas Watson and Jacqueline Jenkins's The Writings of Julian of Norwich (2006) is a newer critical edition. For theological depth, Denys Turner's Julian of Norwich, Theologian (2011) is outstanding. Rowan Williams's essays on Julian, including material in A Ray of Darkness, are excellent. For the cultural context of medieval anchoresses, Ann K. Warren's Anchorites and Their Patrons in Medieval England is definitive. The Julian of Norwich scholarly community remains active; the journal Mystics Quarterly regularly publishes current work.
Your feedback helps other teachers and helps us improve TeachAnyClass.