Socrates (c. 470–399 BCE) was a philosopher in ancient Athens, Greece. He wrote nothing himself — everything we know about him comes from the writings of his students, especially Plato. He spent his life in the streets and public spaces of Athens, asking people questions about the things they claimed to know — justice, courage, virtue, knowledge. He was famously described as the wisest man in Athens, but said this could only be true because he alone knew that he knew nothing. In 399 BCE he was put on trial by the Athenian government, charged with corrupting the youth and not respecting the gods. He was found guilty and sentenced to death by drinking poison. He refused to escape when he had the chance, saying a philosopher must obey the law even when it is unjust.
Socrates matters because he invented — or at least perfected — a way of thinking together that is still the most powerful educational tool we have: the question. He believed that genuine knowledge cannot simply be handed from one person to another. It has to be discovered — through honest conversation, through having your assumptions challenged, through following an argument wherever it leads even when it is uncomfortable. He showed that most people who are confident they know something actually hold a confused or contradictory belief — and that recognising this confusion is the beginning of real understanding. His method, his courage in following arguments honestly, and his willingness to die rather than stop asking questions make him one of the most important figures in the history of education and philosophy.
The best starting point is Plato's Apology — Socrates' defence speech at his trial. It is short, personal, and entirely accessible. Many free translations are available online through Project Gutenberg and the Internet Classics Archive. The BBC's In Our Time podcast has several episodes on Socrates and on Plato that provide excellent 45-minute introductions. Thomas C. Brickhouse and Nicholas D. Smith's Socrates on Trial (1989) gives a clear account of the historical context of his death.
Plato's early dialogues are the most important sources — particularly Euthyphro (on piety and moral authority), Meno (on whether virtue can be taught), Crito (on the obligation to obey the law), and Phaedo (on the soul and death). All are freely available online. Xenophon's Memorabilia gives a very different, more practical portrait of Socrates and is worth reading alongside Plato for comparison. C.C.W.
A Very Short Introduction (Oxford) is the most accessible scholarly introduction.
Ironist and Moral Philosopher (1991) is the most influential modern scholarly treatment.
Socrates claimed to know nothing because he was modest or pretending.
Socrates' claim to know nothing was not false modesty or a rhetorical trick. It was a genuine philosophical position — that honest awareness of the limits of your own knowledge is epistemically and morally superior to false confidence. He demonstrated this position throughout his life by relentlessly questioning his own assumptions as well as other people's. His trial and death showed that his commitment to intellectual honesty was not a performance — he chose death over the comfortable option of simply stopping his questioning.
The Socratic method means arguing until you win.
The Socratic method is not a debating technique designed to defeat an opponent. It is a collaborative method of inquiry aimed at reaching greater clarity and understanding — for both participants. Socrates was not trying to humiliate the people he questioned. He was genuinely trying to think through difficult questions together with them. When used well, the Socratic method produces shared understanding, not winners and losers. When it is used as a rhetorical weapon to trap or embarrass people, it has been distorted from its original purpose.
We know what Socrates really thought because Plato wrote it all down.
Plato's dialogues give us one portrait of Socrates — probably the most philosophically sophisticated one — but it is Plato's portrait, not a transcript. Scholars believe that Plato's earlier dialogues are closer to the historical Socrates, while the later dialogues increasingly express Plato's own views using Socrates as a mouthpiece. Xenophon, Aristophanes, and Aristotle give us different and sometimes contradictory pictures. We cannot be certain which, if any, gives us the real Socrates. This uncertainty is important: it teaches us to be careful about attributing ideas to historical figures and to ask where our knowledge of them comes from.
Socrates was convicted because Athens was anti-intellectual.
The historical reality of Socrates' trial is more complicated. Athens in 399 BCE had recently suffered a traumatic defeat in the Peloponnesian War and a brief but bloody period of oligarchic tyranny. Some of Socrates' close associates — including Alcibiades and Critias — had been involved in these disasters. The charges of corrupting the youth and impiety may have been partly political, reflecting anxiety about his influence on young men who had done real harm to the city. Athens was in many ways the most intellectually open society of its time. Socrates' death was a complex political event, not simply the story of a city that hated ideas.
For the Socratic problem — what we can know about the historical Socrates — Gregory Vlastos's work is essential, particularly the essay The Socratic Elenchus in Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. Plato's Republic, Symposium, and Phaedrus show the later Platonic Socrates at his most developed and metaphysically ambitious. For the relationship between Socrates and Athenian politics: I.F. Stone's controversial The Trial of Socrates (1988) argues that Socrates was genuinely anti-democratic and that Athens had legitimate reasons to fear him — a useful provocation.
A.A.
A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life. All of Plato's dialogues are freely available at the Perseus Digital Library at Tufts University.
Your feedback helps other teachers and helps us improve TeachAnyClass.