All Thinkers

Søren Kierkegaard

Søren Kierkegaard (1813-1855) was a Danish philosopher, writer, and theologian. He was born in Copenhagen, the youngest of seven children, and spent almost his entire life in that city. His father was a wealthy merchant who was deeply religious and had a dark, guilt-ridden character that had a profound effect on Søren. Kierkegaard studied theology at the University of Copenhagen and fell deeply in love with a young woman named Regine Olsen, who he became engaged to and then, mysteriously, broke off the engagement with. This rupture haunted much of his later writing. He wrote an enormous amount in a short life: philosophical works, religious meditations, literary criticism, and a sustained public argument with the established Danish Lutheran church, which he believed had become comfortable and dishonest. He published many works under pen names, using different voices to explore different philosophical positions. He died at forty-two, and much of his work was not read widely outside Denmark until the twentieth century, when it became a major influence on existentialism, theology, and literary theory.

Origin
Denmark, Northern Europe
Lifespan
1813-1855
Era
19th century
Subjects
Existentialism Philosophy Of Religion Ethics Subjectivity Danish Thought
Why They Matter

Kierkegaard matters because he raised questions about the individual human being that philosophy before him had largely ignored. Most philosophy, from Plato onwards, had focused on universal truths: what is knowledge, what is justice, what is the good life in general? Kierkegaard said that this kind of abstract universal philosophy missed the most important thing: what does it mean to be this particular human being, living this particular life, making these particular choices? He argued that genuine human existence requires passionate personal commitment, that truth is not only something you know but something you live, and that the most important questions cannot be answered by reason alone but require a leap into personal engagement. He is often called the father of existentialism because these ideas, taken up and developed by thinkers including Sartre, de Beauvoir, and Camus in the twentieth century, became the foundation of existentialist philosophy. He is also important for his three stages of existence: aesthetic, ethical, and religious, which offer a framework for thinking about different ways of living and their limitations.

Key Ideas
1
Subjectivity is truth
Kierkegaard argued that the most important truths are not objective facts that can be proven to everyone but truths that must be personally lived and committed to. The truths that matter most, about how to live, what to commit your life to, whether there is a God, cannot be settled by argument and evidence alone. They require a personal response: a choice about how to live. He said that subjectivity is truth, meaning that your relationship to a truth, your passionate personal commitment to it, is as important as the truth's objective content. A person who knows all the correct doctrines but believes them without genuine personal engagement has not really grasped the truth.
2
The three stages: aesthetic, ethical, and religious
Kierkegaard described three stages or spheres of existence. In the aesthetic stage, a person lives for pleasure, beauty, and immediate experience. They avoid boredom by seeking novelty and avoid commitment because commitment limits freedom. Eventually the aesthetic life leads to emptiness and despair: the relentless pursuit of new experience leaves the person feeling hollow. The ethical stage involves commitment to universal moral duties: keeping promises, following rules, acting with integrity. This is deeper than the aesthetic life but it too has limits: sometimes universal rules do not fit particular situations, and the ethical person can feel trapped. The religious stage involves a direct personal relationship with God that goes beyond universal ethics.
3
The leap of faith
Kierkegaard argued that religious faith cannot be reached by reason alone. You cannot argue your way to faith. At some point, there is a gap between what reason can establish and what faith requires, and crossing that gap requires a leap: a passionate personal commitment that goes beyond what the evidence can support. This does not mean faith is irrational: it means faith involves a different kind of relationship to truth than scientific knowledge does. The leap of faith is not a surrender of intelligence but an act of the whole person: will, feeling, and reason together. Kierkegaard applied this specifically to Christian faith but the concept has been applied more broadly to any deep personal commitment.
Key Quotations
"The most common form of despair is not being who you are."
— The Sickness Unto Death, 1849
Kierkegaard is making a claim about the most widespread human failure. Most people, he believed, were not being genuinely themselves: they were performing identities shaped by what others expected, what was socially acceptable, what was comfortable and safe. This kind of inauthentic existence is, for Kierkegaard, a form of despair even when the person does not feel particularly sad. The remedy is not a dramatic transformation but an honest engagement with who you actually are and what you actually value, rather than what you think you should be.
"Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards."
— Journals, 1843
This is Kierkegaard's most often quoted statement. He is pointing to a fundamental tension in human existence. We understand our lives in retrospect: looking back, we can see how experiences connected, what they meant, where they led. But we have to make decisions in real time, looking forward, without knowing what will come next or what our choices will mean in the end. This means that genuine human decision-making always involves uncertainty and risk. We cannot wait until we understand everything before we act: life does not permit that. We act, and then, later, we understand.
Using This Thinker in the Classroom
Ethical Thinking When introducing the question of how to live
How to introduce
Ask: what do you think the most important question in philosophy is? After discussion, introduce Kierkegaard's answer: not what is true in general, but what must I do with my own life? He argued that philosophy before him had been too abstract, focused on universal truths rather than the particular challenge of living as a specific individual. Ask: do you agree that this is the most important question? What would philosophy look like if it started from the individual's question of how to live rather than from universal principles?
Self-Regulation When discussing authenticity and self-knowledge
How to introduce
Introduce Kierkegaard's claim: the most common form of despair is not being who you are. Ask: do you think this is true? Can you think of ways in which you present a version of yourself that is shaped by what others expect rather than who you genuinely are? What would it take to be more genuinely yourself? Connect to the self-regulation topic: genuine self-regulation requires knowing what you actually value, not just what you think you should value.
Further Reading

Either/Or (1843) is Kierkegaard's most accessible major work, presenting the aesthetic and ethical stages through contrasting voices. The Diaries are the most personal entry point and give a vivid sense of his character and concerns. For a short overview: Clare Carlisle's Philosopher of the Heart (2019, Allen Lane) is the most accessible recent biography, written for a general audience. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy has a freely available article on Kierkegaard.

Key Ideas
1
Anxiety as the dizziness of freedom
Kierkegaard described anxiety as a fundamental feature of human existence rather than simply a personal psychological problem. Because human beings are free, because we must choose who to be and how to live without any guarantee that we are choosing correctly, we experience anxiety. He called this the dizziness of freedom: standing at the edge of a choice and feeling the vertiginous sense of the possibility of going in any direction. Anxiety is not something to be eliminated: it is a sign that you are genuinely alive to your freedom and your responsibility. The person who feels no anxiety about the important choices of their life is perhaps not taking them seriously enough.
2
Despair: not being oneself
Kierkegaard analysed despair as the fundamental human sickness. Despair, in his sense, is not sadness or depression but a failure to be genuinely oneself: trying to be someone other than who you are, or refusing to accept who you are. You can despair by not wanting to be yourself, trying to be who others want you to be, performing an identity that is not genuinely yours. You can also despair by wanting to be yourself in isolation, refusing to accept your relationship to others and to God. True health is what Kierkegaard called being oneself: a transparent, honest, committed way of existing in which you genuinely are what you appear to be.
3
The individual against the crowd
Kierkegaard was deeply suspicious of crowds, majorities, and the pressure of public opinion. He argued that the truth is rarely found with the majority, and that genuine individual existence requires the courage to stand against the crowd when your own honest judgment requires it. He was critical of the comfortable conformity of his own society, including the Danish church, which he thought had made Christianity so respectable and so comfortable that it had lost its essential challenge. The genuine individual is one who has the courage to be who they genuinely are, even when this puts them at odds with the surrounding culture.
Key Quotations
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use."
— Either/Or, 1843
Kierkegaard is making a sharp observation about the relationship between genuine thinking and the political demand for free speech. He is not arguing against free speech: he is pointing out that the freedom to speak is only valuable if you are genuinely thinking. Most people, he believed, simply repeat the opinions of the crowd, the media, the fashionable view, without genuine independent reflection. Demanding the right to say these thoughts out loud gives the appearance of freedom without the reality. Real intellectual freedom requires the harder work of genuine individual thought.
"Anxiety is the dizziness of freedom."
— The Concept of Anxiety, 1844
Kierkegaard is explaining why anxiety is a fundamental feature of human freedom rather than simply a personal weakness. Standing at the edge of a genuine choice, you feel the vertigo of the multiple directions you could go. This dizziness is not a sign that something is wrong: it is a sign that you are genuinely free and genuinely aware of your freedom. The person who feels no anxiety about important choices is perhaps not really engaging with them. Genuine freedom is exhilarating and frightening at the same time.
Using This Thinker in the Classroom
Learning How to Learn When discussing the difference between knowing and understanding
How to introduce
Introduce Kierkegaard's distinction between knowing truths and living them. Ask: can you think of something you know intellectually but have not genuinely understood? For example: you might know that exercise is good for you but not have genuinely grasped it in a way that changes your behaviour. Kierkegaard argued that the most important truths require personal engagement, not only intellectual acceptance. Ask: what does this imply about how genuine learning works? Is there a difference between knowing something and truly understanding it?
Metacognition When examining the relationship between thinking and action
How to introduce
Present Kierkegaard's insight: life can only be understood backwards but must be lived forwards. Ask: does this resonate with your experience? Think of a decision you made in the past that you did not fully understand at the time but understand better now. What does this tell us about how we should make decisions? If we can never fully understand in advance, what is the role of reflection and planning? Connect to the metacognition topic: thinking about your thinking can help, but it cannot eliminate the fundamental uncertainty of living forwards.
Critical Thinking When discussing conformity and independent thought
How to introduce
Introduce Kierkegaard's suspicion of crowds and majorities. Ask: do you think the majority is usually right? Can you think of historical examples where the majority was wrong and a minority was right? Introduce his observation about free speech and genuine thinking. Ask: is it possible to use your right to speak freely while still just repeating the thoughts of others? What is the difference between genuine independent thinking and the performance of having opinions? What would it take to develop genuinely independent views rather than adopting the fashionable positions of your group?
Further Reading

The Sickness Unto Death (1849) is Kierkegaard's most systematic philosophical work and develops his analysis of despair and selfhood. The Concept of Anxiety (1844) develops his account of anxiety and freedom. For the existentialist context: Walter Kaufmann's anthology Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre (1956, Meridian Books) places Kierkegaard alongside the thinkers he influenced and provides the best single introduction to the tradition.

Key Ideas
1
Indirect communication: truth through stories
Kierkegaard believed that the most important truths cannot be communicated directly. You cannot simply tell someone how to live and have them genuinely understand: they have to discover it for themselves. This is why he used indirect communication: stories, pseudonyms, irony, and literary forms that provoked the reader into thinking rather than simply accepting conclusions. By writing under different pen names and giving voice to different positions, he invited readers to engage critically rather than passively. He believed that a philosopher who simply told people what to think was doing them a disservice: genuine understanding requires the active participation of the reader.
2
Repetition and commitment
Kierkegaard distinguished between two ways of relating to time and experience: recollection and repetition. Recollection looks backward: it tries to recover and preserve the past. Repetition looks forward: it is the willing taking up of a commitment again and again, choosing the same thing despite the passage of time and the change it brings. A person who commits to a relationship, a vocation, or a religious faith in the spirit of repetition is not trapped in the past but is actively renewing their commitment in the present. Kierkegaard saw repetition as the key to genuine selfhood: not a fixed identity given once and for all but an identity continuously chosen and renewed.
3
The teleological suspension of the ethical
One of Kierkegaard's most difficult and important ideas concerns the story of Abraham, who is commanded by God to sacrifice his son Isaac. For Kierkegaard, this story captures the tension between the ethical stage and the religious stage. Abraham's duty as a father and as a moral being is to protect his son. But his duty to God seems to require the opposite. Kierkegaard calls Abraham's willingness to obey God a teleological suspension of the ethical: a moment where the religious obligation temporarily overrides the universal ethical duty. He does not endorse this as a model for everyone: he calls Abraham a knight of faith, a unique and terrifying figure. But the story forces the question of what happens when the deepest personal obligation conflicts with universal moral rules.
Key Quotations
"The truth is a snare: you cannot have it, without being caught. You cannot have the truth in such a way that you catch it, but only in such a way that it catches you."
— Journals
Kierkegaard is making a point about the relationship between the knower and the truth in matters of genuine importance. In science and mathematics, you can know a truth while remaining personally detached from it: the truth is out there and you have captured it. But in the truths that matter most, about how to live and what to commit your life to, this detachment is not possible. The truth grabs you: it makes a claim on you, changes you, demands a response. You cannot understand a genuine ethical or religious truth without being personally engaged by it.
"What I really need is to get clear about what I must do, not what I must know, except insofar as knowledge must precede every act."
— Journals, 1835
Written when Kierkegaard was a young student, this is an early statement of what became his central philosophical concern. He is not rejecting knowledge: he says that knowledge must precede action. But he is insisting that the ultimate question is not intellectual but practical and personal: what must I do? Not what is true in general, but what is required of me, as this particular person, in this particular life? This is the question that existentialism takes as its central concern, and Kierkegaard is widely recognised as the first philosopher to place it at the heart of philosophy.
Using This Thinker in the Classroom
Cultural Heritage and Identity When examining the three stages of existence
How to introduce
Introduce the three stages: aesthetic (living for pleasure and experience), ethical (living by universal moral duties), and religious (a direct personal relationship that transcends universal rules). Ask: do you recognise these stages in yourself or in people you know? Is it possible to be in more than one stage at once? Kierkegaard saw these as not only different styles of living but as different depths of engagement with existence. Ask: which stage do you think most people in your society primarily inhabit? What does this tell us about the values your society promotes?
Philosophy of Religion When discussing the relationship between faith and reason
How to introduce
Introduce Kierkegaard's leap of faith. Ask: can religious faith be justified by argument and evidence? Kierkegaard says no: at some point, faith requires going beyond what reason can establish. This does not make faith irrational, he argues, but it makes it a different kind of relationship to truth than scientific knowledge. Ask: do you find this convincing? Is the leap of faith a courageous personal commitment or an abandonment of intellectual standards? Can this concept apply to other forms of deep personal commitment beyond religion?
Common Misconceptions
Common misconception

Kierkegaard was simply a pessimist who thought life is meaningless and despairing.

What to teach instead

Kierkegaard analysed despair, anxiety, and the difficulties of genuine existence because he believed that honest engagement with these difficulties was necessary for genuine freedom and authentic selfhood. He was not promoting despair but diagnosing it so it could be overcome. He believed in genuine joy, genuine love, and genuine faith as possible outcomes of authentic existence. His writings contain passages of real warmth and humour. His goal was not to promote pessimism but to challenge the comfortable, dishonest optimism that he believed prevented people from genuinely engaging with their lives.

Common misconception

Kierkegaard's focus on the individual means he thought we owe nothing to others.

What to teach instead

The ethical stage of Kierkegaard's framework is explicitly about commitment to universal moral duties and obligations to others. He saw the transition from the aesthetic to the ethical stage as a deepening of the self, not a retreat from the social world. His emphasis on the individual was directed against the comfortable conformity of collective opinion, not against genuine ethical relationships. He believed that genuine love, friendship, and commitment to others were among the most important dimensions of authentic human existence.

Common misconception

Kierkegaard's ideas only apply to religious people or to questions of faith.

What to teach instead

While Kierkegaard was deeply Christian and much of his writing concerns religious questions, his philosophical concepts, including authenticity, anxiety, despair, the individual against the crowd, and indirect communication, have been applied extensively in secular contexts. The existentialist philosophers Sartre, de Beauvoir, and Camus all drew heavily on Kierkegaard while largely removing the religious content. His analysis of what it means to be a genuine individual, to make real choices with real consequences, and to avoid the comfortable self-deceptions of conformity applies to human existence regardless of religious belief.

Common misconception

Kierkegaard's use of pen names means we cannot trust what he wrote.

What to teach instead

Kierkegaard used pseudonyms deliberately as a philosophical method. By giving voice to different positions through different authors, he invited readers to engage critically with each position rather than simply accepting it as his own view. He was careful to distinguish between what the pseudonymous authors said and what he himself believed, and his journals make clear which positions he personally held. The use of indirect communication was not deceptive but pedagogical: he believed that genuine understanding could not be produced by direct assertion but had to be earned through active engagement by the reader.

Intellectual Connections
Influenced
Simone de Beauvoir
De Beauvoir's existentialism, including her analysis of bad faith and the importance of genuine freedom and authentic choice, draws directly on Kierkegaard's analysis of despair, authenticity, and the individual's responsibility to be genuinely themselves. Both argue that the most fundamental human failure is to avoid the responsibility of genuine selfhood by hiding in conformity, social roles, or comfortable self-deception.
Influenced
Frantz Fanon
Fanon's analysis of the colonised person who must choose their own identity in the face of a system that denies it draws on existentialist ideas that trace back to Kierkegaard. The question of authentic selfhood in conditions of oppression, of choosing who you are rather than accepting the identity imposed on you, is Kierkegaardian in spirit even when not explicitly acknowledged.
In Dialogue With
Socrates
Kierkegaard admired Socrates enormously and wrote his doctoral dissertation about him. Both used indirect methods, irony and questioning rather than direct assertion, to provoke genuine thinking rather than passive acceptance. Both believed that the unexamined life was not worth living and that genuine wisdom required honest self-knowledge rather than the accumulation of information. Kierkegaard called Socrates the greatest human being who ever lived.
In Dialogue With
Nagarjuna
Both Kierkegaard and Nagarjuna use indirect, paradoxical methods to provoke insight rather than communicating conclusions directly. Both argue that the most important truths cannot be grasped through ordinary conceptual thinking but require a different kind of engagement. Nagarjuna dissolves fixed positions through logical analysis. Kierkegaard provokes through irony, pseudonyms, and staged contradictions. Both see the reader's active engagement as essential to genuine understanding.
In Dialogue With
Steve Biko
Biko's analysis of authenticity, of the damage done when people accept an identity imposed by others rather than claiming their own, resonates with Kierkegaard's account of despair as not being oneself. Both argue that genuine selfhood requires courage: the courage to be who you actually are rather than who the surrounding system tells you to be. Biko applies this insight in a collective, political context; Kierkegaard in an individual, existential one.
In Dialogue With
Hannah Arendt
Both Kierkegaard and Arendt are concerned with genuine human action as distinct from mere behaviour or conformity. Arendt's concept of action, the capacity to begin something genuinely new in the public realm, shares Kierkegaard's emphasis on the radical responsibility of the individual and the danger of the thoughtless absorption into the crowd. Both are critics of the kind of comfortable conformity that abdicates genuine individual responsibility.
Further Reading

Fear and Trembling (1843), his meditation on Abraham and the teleological suspension of the ethical, is his most discussed philosophical text. Concluding Unscientific Postscript (1846) is his most comprehensive philosophical statement.

For scholarly engagement

Alastair Hannay's Kierkegaard (1982, Routledge) is the most thorough philosophical treatment available in English.

For the indirect communication method

Sylvia Walsh's Kierkegaard: Thinking Christianly in an Existential Mode (2009, Oxford University Press) examines how his literary and philosophical methods work together.