All Thinkers

Zora Neale Hurston

Zora Neale Hurston (1891-1960) was an African American anthropologist, folklorist, and novelist, one of the most significant figures in both the Harlem Renaissance and the history of American anthropology. She was born in Notasulga, Alabama, but grew up in Eatonville, Florida — one of the first incorporated all-Black towns in the United States — an experience that would shape everything she wrote and thought. She studied anthropology under Franz Boas at Barnard College and Columbia University, becoming one of the very few Black women to enter the discipline in that era. Boas recognised her exceptional gifts, particularly her ability to collect folklore from communities that would not have opened to a white researcher. She conducted fieldwork across the American South, the Caribbean, and Central America, collecting African American folklore, Hoodoo practices, and Caribbean religious traditions. She wrote four novels, most famously Their Eyes Were Watching God (1937), two books of folklore, an autobiography, and numerous essays. She died in poverty and obscurity in 1960 and was buried in an unmarked grave. She was recovered for a wide readership by Alice Walker, who found and marked her grave in 1973 and wrote about her in a celebrated essay.

Origin
United States
Lifespan
1891-1960
Era
20th century
Subjects
Anthropology African American Folklore Harlem Renaissance Literature Fieldwork
Why They Matter

Hurston matters for reasons that cross the boundary between anthropology and literature in ways that illuminate both. As an anthropologist, she demonstrated the richness, sophistication, and vitality of African American folk culture at a time when it was systematically dismissed or ignored, and she raised fundamental questions about who gets to study whom, what insider knowledge makes possible that outsider research cannot access, and what form anthropological knowledge should take. As a novelist, she created works of extraordinary beauty that embodied rather than merely described the oral culture she had studied. Her career also raises important and still unresolved questions about the politics of cultural representation: her embrace of Black folk culture was controversial among some Black intellectuals who saw it as reinforcing stereotypes, while her refusal to make her work primarily a protest against racism was controversial among others. She was both ahead of her time and a product of it, and both dimensions are essential for understanding her work.

Key Ideas
1
The insider advantage: studying your own community
Hurston's most distinctive contribution to anthropological method was her demonstration of what insider access made possible. As a Black Southerner studying Black Southern culture, she could enter spaces, hear conversations, and participate in practices that were closed to white researchers — not because she deceived anyone but because she was genuinely part of the communities she studied. Boas recognised this and encouraged her precisely for this reason. But Hurston also understood that insider access was not simply a methodological advantage: it raised questions about what it meant to study your own community, who owned the knowledge she was collecting, and what obligations she had to the people who shared their lives and culture with her.
2
African American folklore as a living tradition
Hurston's fieldwork, collected in Mules and Men (1935) and Tell My Horse (1938), documented African American folklore, storytelling traditions, and spiritual practices as living, vital, and sophisticated cultural forms — not as survivals of a dying past or as evidence of cultural inferiority. The stories, jokes, songs, and Hoodoo practices she collected were not primitive superstitions but complex cultural resources through which communities made sense of their world, preserved their history, expressed their values, and maintained their dignity under conditions of oppression. This was a direct challenge to the dismissal of Black folk culture by both white Americans and by some Black intellectuals who saw folk traditions as an embarrassment.
3
Their Eyes Were Watching God: anthropology as art
Hurston's novel Their Eyes Were Watching God (1937) is her greatest achievement and one of the most important American novels of the twentieth century. It emerged directly from her anthropological fieldwork: its language, its characters, its setting, and its cultural texture were all products of her years of collecting folklore in Florida and the South. But it was not a document — it was a work of art that embodied rather than merely described the culture it came from. Hurston showed that the most authentic way to represent a culture might not be the ethnographic monograph but the novel, the story, the poem — forms that could carry the living texture of a culture's expression rather than only analysing it from the outside.
Key Quotations
"I am not tragically colored. There is no great sorrow dammed up in my soul, nor lurking behind my eyes. I do not mind at all. I do not belong to the sobbing school of Negrohood."
— How It Feels to Be Colored Me, 1928
Hurston is refusing the expectation that a Black writer in 1928 must primarily express suffering, sorrow, and the weight of racial oppression. She is insisting on the full complexity of her own experience — which included vitality, joy, pride, and a sense of cultural richness — rather than reducing herself to what white readers expected to find and what some Black intellectuals thought was the proper subject of Black expression. This was a radical act of self-definition: refusing to be defined by the dominant culture's image of what she must be.
"Research is formalized curiosity. It is poking and prying with a purpose."
— Dust Tracks on a Road, 1942
Hurston is defining research in a way that captures its essential spirit better than most academic definitions. Curiosity — the genuine desire to know and understand — is what drives good research. Formalization gives it discipline and direction. But the poking and prying is irreducible: genuine research requires getting close to your subject, not remaining at a safe analytical distance. This definition also captures something of Hurston's own approach to fieldwork: genuinely curious, genuinely engaged, willing to get close.
Using This Thinker in the Classroom
Cultural Heritage and Identity When discussing oral traditions and folk culture as legitimate forms of knowledge
How to introduce
Ask: what stories, songs, and sayings do people in your community pass down? Are these considered as valuable as written literature and formal knowledge? After discussion, introduce Hurston's project: she devoted her career to showing that African American folk traditions were not inferior survivals of a pre-literate past but sophisticated, living, and valuable cultural forms. Ask: what is at stake in whether folk traditions are taken seriously? What is lost if they are dismissed? Connect to Kimmerer's argument about indigenous ecological knowledge and to Ngugi's argument about the legitimacy of African oral traditions.
Research Skills When examining what insider access makes possible in research
How to introduce
Ask: are there things about your community that a researcher from outside could never fully understand, no matter how long they spent studying it? What would they miss? After discussion, introduce Hurston's situation: as a Black Southerner studying Black Southern communities, she had access to practices, conversations, and levels of trust that were unavailable to white researchers. Boas recognised this as a methodological advantage. Ask: what are the advantages of studying your own community? What are the complications and the ethical obligations?
Further Reading

Their Eyes Were Watching God (1937, Lippincott) is the essential starting point and is widely available.

For the folklore collection

Mules and Men (1935, Lippincott) gives the best sense of her anthropological work in an accessible form.

For her voice directly

The essay How It Feels to Be Colored Me (1928) is freely available online and can be read in fifteen minutes.

Key Ideas
1
The politics of Black cultural representation
Hurston's work provoked controversy within Black intellectual circles, particularly from Richard Wright and Langston Hughes, who criticised Their Eyes Were Watching God for not being sufficiently political, for depicting Black life without foregrounding the suffering caused by racism. Hurston's response, implicit in her work and explicit in her essays, was that Black life was not defined by racism and that Black culture had intrinsic worth and beauty that demanded representation on its own terms, not only as a record of oppression. She believed that insisting all Black art had to be protest art was itself a form of limiting Black expression — it denied the full humanity of Black people by insisting that their suffering was the only thing about them worth representing.
2
Hoodoo and Caribbean religion: taking spiritual practice seriously
Hurston's fieldwork on Hoodoo practices in the American South and on Vodou, Obeah, and other Afro-Caribbean religious traditions in Jamaica, Haiti, and Bermuda was unusual in taking these spiritual practices seriously on their own terms rather than treating them as superstition or pathology. She was initiated into Hoodoo herself and described the practices she encountered with respect and curiosity rather than condescension. This approach anticipated later anthropological debates about the researcher's relationship to spiritual and religious practices in the communities they studied.
3
Language as cultural expression: the poetry of folk speech
Hurston paid extraordinary attention to language — to the specific ways Black Southern communities used English, to the metaphors, rhythms, and rhetorical patterns of folk speech. She argued that African American vernacular English was not a degraded or incorrect version of standard English but a distinct and expressive linguistic tradition with its own aesthetic resources. Her fiction reproduced this language on the page rather than translating it into standard English — a decision that was both artistically and politically significant. It said: this language is worth preserving in its own form; it is not inferior to standard English but different and beautiful.
Key Quotations
"Sometimes, I feel discriminated against, but it does not make me angry. It merely astonishes me. How can any deny themselves the pleasure of my company? It's beyond me."
— How It Feels to Be Colored Me, 1928
Hurston is using wit and self-confidence to respond to racism in a way that refuses to grant it the power to define her. Discrimination astonishes rather than diminishes her because she begins from a position of secure self-worth rather than from a position of seeking white approval. The wit is politically significant: it is the wit of someone who knows their own value and finds those who deny it more foolish than threatening. This is the literary equivalent of Biko's Black Consciousness — self-possession rather than reaction.
"She was stretched on her back beneath the pear tree soaking in the alto chant of the visiting bees, the gold of the sun and the panting breath of the breeze when the inaudible voice of it all came to her."
— Their Eyes Were Watching God, 1937
This passage from Their Eyes Were Watching God demonstrates what made Hurston's fiction so distinctive and so important: it brought the oral and sensory richness of Black Southern experience into literary form without translating it into standard literary English or standard anthropological prose. The writing is both beautiful and culturally specific — it embodies the culture it describes rather than observing it from outside. This was Hurston's answer to the question of how to represent a culture: not by describing it but by finding the form that carried its living texture.
Using This Thinker in the Classroom
Critical Literacy When examining the debate about what Black art should do
How to introduce
Introduce the controversy around Their Eyes Were Watching God: Richard Wright said it had no protest, no politics; Hurston said Black life was not defined by racism and deserved representation on its own terms. Ask: should literature primarily serve political purposes — document injustice, demand change? Or should it represent the full complexity of human experience, including joy and beauty? Can it do both? Connect to Morrison's refusal of the white gaze and to Achebe's argument about literature as an expression of identity rather than only as a political instrument. Ask: who should decide what stories a community tells about itself?
Storytelling and Narrative When examining how language embodies culture
How to introduce
Introduce Hurston's decision to write Their Eyes Were Watching God in African American vernacular English rather than translating the dialogue into standard English. Ask: what would have been lost in translation? What is the difference between writing about a community's language and writing in it? Connect to Anzaldúa's mixed-language writing and to Ngugi's decision to write in Gikuyu: all three argue that the language is not a neutral container for content but part of the content itself. Ask: can you think of examples from your own community where the way something is said is as important as what is said?
Critical Thinking When examining the politics of who studies whom
How to introduce
Introduce the asymmetry in who does research on whom: in the history of anthropology, Western researchers studied non-Western communities; white researchers studied Black communities; men studied women. Hurston was unusual: a Black woman studying her own community. Ask: does it matter who does the research? What difference does it make to the knowledge produced? Connect to Menchú's insistence that she was speaking for and from her community rather than being spoken about, and to Morrison's refusal to write under the white gaze. Ask: is there a politics of who gets to be the researcher and who gets to be the researched?
Further Reading

Dust Tracks on a Road (1942) is her autobiography and gives the most direct account of her life and formation.

For Tell My Horse (1938, Lippincott)

This account of her Caribbean fieldwork is less well known but important for her anthropological work.

For the context of her rediscovery

Alice Walker's essay In Search of Zora Neale Hurston, collected in In Search of Our Mothers' Gardens (1983, Harcourt), is the essential document of her recovery.

Key Ideas
1
The politics of fieldwork: collection and exploitation
Hurston's career raises questions about the relationship between the communities that produce cultural knowledge and the institutions that collect, preserve, and distribute it. The folklore she collected belonged, in some sense, to the communities who had created it. Her collection and publication of it made it available to a wider world — but it also extracted it from its living context and placed it in a form controlled by academic and publishing institutions. These questions about intellectual property, cultural ownership, and the ethics of collection have become central to contemporary debates about research ethics and indigenous knowledge rights.
2
Rediscovery and the politics of the literary canon
Hurston died in poverty and obscurity, largely forgotten, and was buried in an unmarked grave. She was recovered for a wide readership by Alice Walker's essay In Search of Zora Neale Hurston (1975) and the subsequent republication of Their Eyes Were Watching God. Her rediscovery raised questions about whose work got preserved in the literary and anthropological canon, whose was allowed to fall out of print, and what criteria determined canonical status. The politics of recovery — bringing forgotten work back into circulation — was itself a political act, and Hurston's rediscovery was part of the broader project of feminist and Black literary recovery of the 1970s and 1980s.
3
How it feels to be coloured me: the self as cultural position
Hurston's essay How It Feels to Be Colored Me (1928) is one of the most unusual and important statements about race and identity in American literature. Rather than writing about the suffering caused by racism, she wrote about her own experience of Blackness as a source of vitality, specificity, and pride. She described being the most coloured person in the world — not as a deficit but as a distinctive richness of experience and perspective. This was a direct challenge to the expectation that Black writers should primarily document their suffering. It also anticipated contemporary arguments about standpoint epistemology: your specific cultural position shapes what you can know and how you know it.
Key Quotations
"There is no greater agony than bearing an untold story inside you."
— Dust Tracks on a Road, 1942
Hurston is making a claim about the relationship between selfhood and expression that runs through all her work. The stories that communities tell — the folklore, the oral traditions, the vernacular literature — are not merely entertainment but the means by which communities know themselves and pass their knowledge forward. An untold story is not simply unexpressed: it is a part of experience that has not been acknowledged, a piece of culture that has not been preserved, a dimension of humanity that has not been recognised. Hurston's life work was to tell stories that would otherwise have remained untold.
"I have been in Sorrow's kitchen and licked out all the pots. Then I have stood on the peaky mountain wrapped in rainbows, with a harp and a sword in my hands."
— Dust Tracks on a Road, 1942
Hurston is describing her own life in the metaphorical language of the folk tradition she had spent her career documenting — using the very idiom she had studied as the medium of her self-expression. She had experienced genuine suffering — poverty, discrimination, failure, and obscurity — but also genuine joy and achievement. The image holds both without sentimentalising either. This was characteristic of her stance: honest about difficulty while refusing to let difficulty define her or her community's self-understanding.
Using This Thinker in the Classroom
Research Skills When examining the ethics of collecting and publishing community knowledge
How to introduce
Introduce the question that Hurston's career raises: the folklore she collected belonged in some sense to the communities who had created it over generations. By publishing it, she made it available to a wider world — but also extracted it from its living context and placed it in institutions she did not control. Ask: who owns folk knowledge? What obligations does a researcher have to the community whose knowledge they collect? Connect to contemporary debates about intellectual property and indigenous knowledge: when commercial interests exploit traditional knowledge without consent or compensation, what principle has been violated? Connect to Kimmerer's argument about the knowledge embedded in indigenous relationships with the natural world.
Cultural Heritage and Identity When examining the politics of recovery and the literary canon
How to introduce
Introduce Hurston's rediscovery by Alice Walker: a major writer died in poverty and obscurity, buried in an unmarked grave, only to be recovered by the next generation. Ask: why had she been forgotten? What determined who was preserved in the literary and intellectual canon and who was not? Connect to Du Bois's Black Reconstruction — suppressed by the racist historiography it challenged — and to Thompson's recovery of ordinary working people from historical obscurity. Ask: whose knowledge and whose stories tend to be preserved, and whose tend to be lost? What would it mean to actively work to recover what has been suppressed?
Common Misconceptions
Common misconception

Hurston was primarily a novelist who did some anthropology on the side.

What to teach instead

Hurston was a rigorously trained anthropologist who studied under Franz Boas, one of the founders of the discipline, and conducted serious fieldwork across the American South and Caribbean. Her folklore collections are major works of anthropological scholarship, not subsidiary to her fiction. She saw anthropology and literature as complementary ways of doing the same work: understanding and representing the richness of Black folk culture. Treating her as primarily a novelist obscures the anthropological training and fieldwork that made her literary work possible.

Common misconception

Hurston's refusal to write protest literature meant she was not concerned with racism.

What to teach instead

Hurston was deeply aware of and opposed to racism throughout her life. Her refusal to make racial protest the primary content of her art was a considered position about what Black art should do, not an absence of political awareness. She believed that insisting all Black art must be protest reduced Black people to their suffering and denied the full complexity of their humanity and their culture. She also wrote directly about racism in her essays, and her fiction implicitly challenged racist assumptions about Black life by presenting it in all its richness and complexity.

Common misconception

Because Hurston was an insider, her research was automatically more reliable than outsider research.

What to teach instead

Insider status provided Hurston with access and a level of cultural understanding that outsider researchers lacked. But insider status also came with its own complications: the pressure to present her community in a particular way, the difficulty of maintaining analytical distance from what was familiar and personally meaningful, and the complexity of her obligation to the people whose culture she was collecting and publishing. Good anthropological research requires reflexivity about one's own position regardless of whether one is an insider or an outsider.

Common misconception

Hurston's obscurity at the end of her life was simply a result of changing literary fashions.

What to teach instead

Hurston's marginalisation was partly the result of the political controversy her positions generated: her opposition to the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education school desegregation ruling on conservative states' rights grounds alienated many Black intellectuals. But it also reflected systematic forces in American publishing and academic life that made it difficult for Black women writers to maintain careers. Her recovery in the 1970s was not simply a restoration of someone temporarily forgotten but a deliberate political act of reclamation by Black feminist scholars who recognised both her literary achievement and the political dimensions of her suppression.

Intellectual Connections
Develops
Franz Boas
Hurston was one of Boas's most gifted students and the person who best demonstrated what his methodological principles could produce when combined with genuine insider access. She dedicated Mules and Men to him. But her work also exceeded his framework: her integration of anthropology and literature, her insider perspective, and her insistence on the intrinsic value of Black folk culture went beyond what Boas had theorised. She took his tools and used them in ways he had not anticipated.
In Dialogue With
Toni Morrison
Morrison cited Hurston as a foundational influence and Their Eyes Were Watching God as a work that showed what Black literature could be when written from within the culture rather than in explanation to outsiders. Both insisted on the full richness of Black inner and cultural life against those who would reduce it to a record of suffering. Both also made formal innovations in their writing — Morrison through her complex narrative structures, Hurston through her use of vernacular language — that embodied rather than merely described the cultures they came from.
In Dialogue With
W.E.B. Du Bois
Hurston and Du Bois represent contrasting approaches to the representation and advancement of African American culture. Du Bois emphasised the talented tenth and the importance of high cultural achievement in challenging racist ideology. Hurston emphasised the richness of folk culture and the danger of Black intellectuals dismissing their own community's traditions. Both were committed to Black dignity and self-determination, but they understood the cultural politics of this commitment very differently. Their contrast illuminates ongoing debates about the relationship between popular and elite culture in African American intellectual life.
In Dialogue With
Margaret Mead
Hurston and Mead were contemporaries at Columbia who both studied under Boas and both conducted fieldwork in communities very different from the mainstream of American academic life. But their positions were fundamentally asymmetric: Mead was a white outsider studying Pacific communities, Hurston was a Black insider studying her own communities. This difference gave Hurston access Mead could never have, but also created obligations and complications Mead did not face. Their contrasting positions illuminate the range of epistemological positions available in anthropological fieldwork.
Complements
Robin Wall Kimmerer
Both Hurston and Kimmerer argue for the validity and vitality of knowledge embedded in specific cultural and ecological traditions — traditions that dominant academic culture had dismissed as primitive or unscientific. Hurston argued for African American folk knowledge; Kimmerer argues for Potawatomi ecological knowledge. Both show that this knowledge was not primitive superstition but sophisticated, place-specific understanding that could not be captured by the abstractions of academic scholarship. Both also combine this scholarly argument with literary artistry that embodies rather than merely describes the knowledge they are defending.
In Dialogue With
Ngugi wa Thiong'o
Both Hurston and Ngugi argue that the oral, vernacular, and folk traditions of their communities were legitimate, sophisticated, and valuable — and that their dismissal by dominant culture was an act of cultural violence rather than an accurate assessment of their worth. Both also made the political decision to write in the vernacular forms of their communities rather than translating those forms into the standard literary English of the dominant culture. Hurston's use of African American vernacular English and Ngugi's use of Gikuyu are parallel acts of cultural affirmation.
Further Reading

For rigorous scholarly engagement

Valerie Boyd's Wrapped in Rainbows: The Life of Zora Neale Hurston (2003, Scribner) is the definitive biography.

For Hurston and anthropology

Deborah Plant's Zora Neale Hurston: A Biography of the Spirit (2007, Praeger) examines her scholarly work.

For Hurston and the Harlem Renaissance

George Hutchinson's The Harlem Renaissance in Black and White (1995, Harvard University Press) provides the full intellectual context.

For the politics of her recovery

Cheryl Wall's Women of the Harlem Renaissance (1995, Indiana University Press) examines the feminist scholarly recovery of which Hurston's rediscovery was part.